N※N

Trump announces trade agreement with the Philippines and a 19% tariff | CNN Business

Trump Administration Strikes Landmark Trade Deal with Philippines Amid Escalating Asia-Pacific Tensions

In a move that underscores President Donald Trump's aggressive approach to reshaping global trade dynamics, the United States has finalized a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement with the Philippines. Announced on Tuesday, the deal aims to boost economic ties between the two nations, reduce tariffs on key goods, and enhance investment opportunities, all while serving as a strategic counterweight to China's growing influence in the region. The agreement, dubbed the U.S.-Philippines Economic Partnership Accord (USPEPA), comes at a time when geopolitical tensions in the South China Sea are at a boiling point, and it represents one of the first major trade initiatives of Trump's second term.

The pact was signed during a high-profile ceremony at the White House, attended by Philippine President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. and a delegation of business leaders from both countries. Trump, flanked by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, hailed the deal as a "win-win" for American workers and Filipino entrepreneurs. "This is about bringing jobs back home, securing our supply chains, and standing up to unfair trade practices from adversaries like China," Trump declared in his remarks. Marcos echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that the agreement would "strengthen our historic alliance and foster mutual prosperity in an increasingly uncertain world."

At its core, the USPEPA seeks to eliminate or significantly reduce tariffs on a wide array of products, including agricultural goods, electronics, and textiles. For instance, U.S. exports of soybeans, wheat, and poultry to the Philippines will see tariffs drop from an average of 15% to zero over the next five years, providing a much-needed boost to American farmers who have struggled with market access in Asia. In return, Philippine exports such as semiconductors, garments, and tropical fruits will gain preferential treatment in the U.S. market, potentially increasing their value by billions annually. The deal also includes provisions for digital trade, intellectual property protection, and labor standards, aligning with Trump's "America First" agenda while addressing concerns about worker exploitation in developing economies.

Economists project that the agreement could add up to $10 billion in bilateral trade volume within the first three years, building on the current $30 billion annual trade relationship. The Philippines, with its rapidly growing economy and young workforce, stands to benefit from increased foreign direct investment, particularly in sectors like renewable energy and technology manufacturing. U.S. companies such as Apple and Intel, which already have significant operations in the Philippines, are expected to expand their footprints, creating thousands of jobs on both sides of the Pacific. However, critics warn that the deal could exacerbate income inequality in the Philippines if not accompanied by robust domestic reforms.

This trade initiative is not occurring in a vacuum. It arrives against the backdrop of heightened U.S.-China rivalry, where the Philippines plays a pivotal role due to its strategic location and ongoing territorial disputes with Beijing in the South China Sea. The U.S. has long viewed the Philippines as a key ally in its Indo-Pacific strategy, bolstered by mutual defense treaties dating back to the 1950s. Trump's administration has ramped up military cooperation, including joint exercises and arms sales, and this economic pact is seen as an extension of that partnership. By deepening trade ties, the U.S. aims to wean the Philippines away from economic dependence on China, which remains its largest trading partner despite political frictions.

The deal's origins trace back to Trump's first term, when he withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and pursued bilateral agreements instead. Negotiations with the Philippines began in earnest in 2023, amid Marcos's efforts to pivot away from his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte's pro-China stance. Duterte's administration had cozied up to Beijing, securing infrastructure loans under the Belt and Road Initiative, but at the cost of strained relations with Washington. Marcos, seeking to balance these influences, has welcomed U.S. overtures, including this trade deal, as a means to diversify the Philippine economy and enhance national security.

Experts have mixed reactions to the agreement. Supporters, like those at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, praise it for promoting free-market principles and creating a bulwark against Chinese economic coercion. "This is a smart, targeted deal that leverages our strengths in innovation and agriculture while helping an ally build resilience," said Myron Brilliant, executive vice president at the Chamber. On the other hand, labor unions and environmental groups express reservations. The AFL-CIO has criticized the pact for potentially undermining U.S. manufacturing jobs, arguing that lower labor costs in the Philippines could lead to offshoring. Environmental advocates point out that increased agricultural trade might accelerate deforestation in the Philippines, urging stricter sustainability clauses.

Politically, the deal has garnered bipartisan support in Congress, though not without debate. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) acknowledged its strategic value but called for amendments to ensure fair labor practices. Meanwhile, Republican hawks like Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) lauded it as a "direct challenge to China's predatory tactics." The agreement still requires ratification by both nations' legislatures, with the U.S. Senate expected to vote by fall, potentially facing amendments on issues like human rights, given ongoing concerns about extrajudicial killings in the Philippines from the Duterte era.

Beyond immediate economic benefits, the USPEPA could set a precedent for Trump's broader trade strategy in Asia. The president has signaled interest in similar deals with Vietnam, Indonesia, and even India, aiming to create a network of bilateral pacts that circumvent multilateral frameworks like the World Trade Organization, which Trump has frequently derided as ineffective. This approach contrasts sharply with the Biden administration's emphasis on alliances like the Quad and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, which focused on collective standards rather than one-on-one negotiations.

For the Philippines, the deal represents a delicate balancing act. While it promises economic growth—potentially lifting GDP by 1-2% annually, according to Philippine government estimates—it also risks alienating China, which could retaliate through trade restrictions or heightened military posturing in disputed waters. Recent incidents, such as Chinese vessels harassing Philippine fishermen, underscore the volatility. Marcos has navigated this by maintaining diplomatic channels with Beijing while strengthening U.S. ties, a strategy that analysts describe as "hedging" in an era of great-power competition.

Looking ahead, the success of the USPEPA will hinge on implementation and enforcement. Both sides have committed to a joint commission to monitor compliance, with mechanisms for dispute resolution modeled after the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Challenges remain, including supply chain disruptions from global events like climate change and pandemics, which could affect trade flows. Moreover, domestic politics in both countries could influence outcomes: Trump's reelection in 2024 was predicated on promises of tough trade deals, and any perceived failures could impact his legacy, while Marcos faces midterm elections in 2025 that may test public support for closer U.S. alignment.

In the broader context of global trade, this agreement highlights a shift toward protectionism and bilateralism, diverging from the post-World War II liberal order. As Trump continues to prioritize deals that favor U.S. interests, the USPEPA could either foster a new era of prosperous partnerships or exacerbate divisions in an already fragmented world economy. For now, it stands as a testament to the enduring U.S.-Philippine alliance, forged in the fires of history and now tempered by the demands of modern geopolitics.

The deal's ripple effects are already being felt in financial markets, with Philippine stocks surging 3% on the announcement and U.S. agricultural futures ticking upward. Business leaders from Manila to Washington are optimistic, viewing it as a foundation for long-term collaboration. Yet, as with any major trade pact, the true measure of success will be in its ability to deliver tangible benefits to everyday citizens, from Midwestern farmers to Filipino factory workers. As negotiations conclude and implementation begins, the world watches to see if this accord will indeed herald a new chapter in trans-Pacific relations or become another flashpoint in the ongoing U.S.-China rivalry. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/22/business/trump-philippines-trade-deal ]