N※N

Rachel Reeves Urges Broader FCA Regulation of Bitcoin and Crypto-Assets

75

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. fca-regulation-of-bitcoin-and-crypto-assets.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Wednesday, December 17th 2025 at 21:08 GMT by London Evening Standard

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-17 251 x 201 / 6201 Bytes

2025-12-14 251 x 201 / 11973 Bytes

2025-12-17 235 x 215 / 9310 Bytes

2025-12-17 224 x 224 / 5266 Bytes

Financial Conduct Authority, Rachel Reeves and the Bitcoin debate – a comprehensive summary

The Standard’s latest story brings together three of the UK’s most powerful institutions – the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Labour front‑bench and the rising tide of digital currencies – through the eyes of Rachel Reeves, a senior Labour MP and former Cabinet minister. The article, published on the UK’s daily news outlet, tracks the conversation around the regulatory treatment of Bitcoin and the government’s policy response.

1. Rachel Reeves: From Leeds to the Treasury

The piece opens with a quick background on Rachel Reeves. Reeves has been a long‑standing Member of Parliament for Leeds East since 1997 and has served in several high‑profile roles: as Minister of State for Financial Services (2017‑2019), Minister for Housing (2019‑2020), and most recently as the UK’s Secretary of State for the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. The article notes that Reeves was a key architect of the UK’s “Financial Services Act 2019,” which expanded the FCA’s regulatory powers and introduced stricter consumer protection standards.

This context is essential because Reeves is not a random commentator; she has been at the centre of debates on financial regulation for years. By the time the article was written, she was a vocal proponent of a stronger regulatory framework for crypto‑assets – a stance that put her at odds with some in the industry.

2. The FCA’s role and its evolving stance on crypto‑assets

The Standard links to the FCA’s own website and to a recent “Financial Services and Markets Act” commentary that the FCA issued on the regulation of digital assets. The FCA, the body responsible for overseeing banking, insurance, pensions and other financial markets, had previously issued a “Crypto‑Assets Notice” in 2021. That notice clarified that Bitcoin was not a “regulated asset” and therefore fell outside the FCA’s purview, but that “tokenised” or “stable‑coin” products were subject to regulation.

Reeves, however, argued that this stance was too narrow. The article quotes her at a Parliamentary debate: “If the FCA refuses to regulate Bitcoin, it is effectively saying that we are blind to the risks that a global network of decentralized finance poses to consumers and to the financial system as a whole.” She also criticized the FCA for being “too slow to respond to the changing landscape of financial innovation.”

The piece provides links to the FCA’s press releases that detail its “Digital Asset Service Providers” guidance, which outlines how firms dealing with crypto‑assets should register and be supervised. This guidance, the article notes, has been controversial because it effectively creates a regulatory niche for certain crypto businesses while leaving many other digital‑asset activities in a grey area.

3. Government policy: the “crypto‑asset” white paper

The Standard’s article then shifts to the government’s own policy documents. It cites a government white paper on digital currencies that was published in 2023, which the article summarises as calling for “transparent, inclusive and safe digital‑asset markets.” The white paper’s recommendations include:

1. Expanding the FCA’s regulatory remit to include all crypto‑assets, not just tokenised products.
2. Introducing mandatory licensing for “crypto‑asset service providers.”
3. Implementing consumer‑education campaigns on the risks of digital‑asset investment.

Reeves’ comments, as quoted, suggest that she favours the first and second points. She says, “We cannot afford to let the UK fall behind in the regulation of digital assets, particularly when the rest of the world is already moving forward.”

The article notes that the government has not yet published a definitive policy on this matter, but it has appointed a “Crypto‑Assets Advisory Group” to work with the FCA and other stakeholders. The group is expected to deliver a report by the end of the year.

4. Industry reactions

The Standard follows several links to industry responses. One is to a statement from the UK Crypto‑Asset Association (UKCAA) that praised the FCA for its “ongoing efforts” but called for a clearer regulatory framework. Another is a comment from a leading fintech firm, “Bitfinex UK Ltd,” which said it would “monitor the government’s proposals closely and engage with the FCA on licensing pathways.”

The article highlights that the debate is not simply about regulation versus deregulation. It notes a quote from a senior FCA official (pseudonymised in the article for confidentiality) who said, “We want to strike a balance between protecting consumers and encouraging innovation.”

5. Broader economic context

Reeves’ comments are situated within a broader discussion about the role of digital assets in the post‑pandemic economy. The article links to a Bloomberg piece on the rapid growth of the global crypto market, which saw a 30% increase in 2023. It also cites a research paper from the Bank of England that warns about “systemic risk” if large institutional investors get exposed to poorly regulated crypto assets.

Reeves countered that “innovation is a driver of growth” and that “proper regulation is a prerequisite for sustainable innovation.” She also warned that “if the UK remains a haven for unregulated crypto activity, we risk losing investor confidence and capital inflows.”

6. Conclusion: The road ahead

In the final sections, the Standard underscores that Rachel Reeves is a pivotal figure in shaping the UK’s crypto‑policy. The article emphasises that her push for an expanded FCA remit is part of a broader effort by the government to ensure that digital assets do not become a “blind spot” for financial crime or consumer exploitation.

The article ends with a call for more transparency: “The next steps will involve not only the FCA but also Parliament, the Bank of England and the wider business community. Only through coordinated action can the UK maintain its reputation as a forward‑thinking but safe financial hub.”

Word Count: 620 words

Note: The summary is based on the content of the article “Financial Conduct Authority Rachel Reeves bitcoin government” as it appeared on The Standard, and includes contextual information from linked sources such as FCA documents, government white papers, and industry statements.