Fri, July 18, 2025
Thu, July 17, 2025
Mon, July 14, 2025
Sun, July 13, 2025
Sat, July 12, 2025
Fri, July 11, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 11th ]: Reuters
Take Five: Duck and swerve
Thu, July 10, 2025

Watchdogs insist reducing regulation will not increase risk of financial crisis

  Copy link into your clipboard //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. -will-not-increase-risk-of-financial-crisis.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Business and Finance on by London Evening Standard
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  MPs raised concerns that a move to cut red tape typically comes before major financial turmoil.

- Click to Lock Slider
In a compelling and urgent call to action, Professor David Bailey and Labour MP Liam Byrne have issued a stark warning to the UK government, particularly targeting Chancellor Rachel Reeves, about the looming crisis in the British automotive industry. Their joint plea, articulated through a detailed opinion piece, underscores the critical state of the sector, which they argue is at a pivotal tipping point. The industry, once a cornerstone of British manufacturing and economic strength, is now grappling with unprecedented challenges that threaten its very survival. Bailey and Byrne assert that without immediate and decisive government intervention, the UK risks losing its automotive manufacturing base entirely, with devastating consequences for jobs, regional economies, and national industrial capability.

The authors begin by painting a grim picture of the current landscape. The UK automotive sector, which has historically been a symbol of industrial prowess, is facing a perfect storm of challenges. These include the global shift towards electric vehicles (EVs), supply chain disruptions, and intense international competition. The transition to EVs, while necessary for environmental reasons, has placed enormous pressure on manufacturers who must invest heavily in new technologies and infrastructure while simultaneously phasing out traditional internal combustion engine production. This shift is not merely a technological challenge but a financial one, as the costs of retooling factories and retraining workforces are staggering. Meanwhile, supply chain issues, exacerbated by Brexit and global geopolitical tensions, have made it difficult for UK manufacturers to secure the components they need at competitive prices. Added to this is the fierce competition from countries like China, which are aggressively investing in EV production and dominating the market for critical materials such as batteries.

Bailey and Byrne highlight the specific vulnerabilities of the UK in this global race. Unlike other major automotive nations, the UK lacks a robust domestic battery manufacturing base, often referred to as a "gigafactory" ecosystem. This absence means that British carmakers are heavily reliant on imported batteries, which not only increases costs but also exposes the industry to supply chain risks and foreign policy fluctuations. The authors point out that countries like Germany, France, and even Hungary have secured significant investments in battery production, positioning themselves as leaders in the EV revolution. In contrast, the UK has lagged behind, with promised gigafactory projects either delayed or failing to materialize at the scale needed to support the industry. This gap in infrastructure is a critical weakness that threatens to undermine the competitiveness of UK-made vehicles in a rapidly electrifying global market.

The economic implications of this crisis are profound, and the authors do not shy away from detailing the potential fallout. The automotive sector is a major employer, particularly in regions like the West Midlands, where entire communities depend on the jobs and economic activity generated by car manufacturing. The collapse of this industry would not only result in mass unemployment but also devastate ancillary businesses, from suppliers to service providers, creating a ripple effect across the economy. Bailey and Byrne warn that the loss of automotive manufacturing would also erode the UK’s industrial skills base, making it harder to rebuild the sector in the future. Once factories close and skilled workers leave the industry, the knowledge and expertise they carry are often lost forever, representing a permanent blow to the nation’s manufacturing capacity.

Central to their argument is a critique of the government’s current approach, or lack thereof, to supporting the industry. While acknowledging that past administrations have made some efforts to promote green technology and attract investment, Bailey and Byrne argue that these measures have been insufficient and poorly coordinated. They call for a comprehensive industrial strategy that prioritizes the automotive sector as a national asset. This strategy, they suggest, should include targeted financial incentives to attract private investment in gigafactories, as well as public funding for research and development in EV technologies. They also advocate for policies to secure the supply of critical raw materials, such as lithium and cobalt, which are essential for battery production. Without such interventions, they warn, the UK risks becoming a mere assembler of imported components rather than a true innovator and manufacturer in the automotive space.

The authors also address the broader geopolitical context, noting that the automotive crisis is not just an economic issue but a matter of national security and sovereignty. In an era where industrial capability is increasingly tied to global power dynamics, the ability to produce vehicles domestically—especially those critical to future technologies like EVs—is a strategic imperative. Relying on foreign supply chains for essential components leaves the UK vulnerable to external shocks, whether they come in the form of trade disputes, political instability, or natural disasters. Bailey and Byrne argue that the government must view the automotive sector through this lens, recognizing that its survival is not just about jobs but about maintaining the UK’s place in the global economic order.

In their appeal to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the authors emphasize the urgency of the situation. They urge her to use her position to champion a bold rescue plan for the industry, one that leverages both public and private resources to secure its future. This includes offering tax breaks and grants to incentivize investment in EV production, as well as forging international partnerships to ensure access to critical materials. They also call for a renewed focus on skills training, ensuring that the workforce is equipped to handle the demands of a rapidly evolving industry. The message is clear: time is running out, and half-measures will not suffice. The government must act decisively to prevent the collapse of a sector that has been a bedrock of British industry for over a century.

Beyond policy prescriptions, Bailey and Byrne also appeal to a sense of national pride and responsibility. They remind readers of the UK’s storied history in automotive innovation, from the early days of motorcar production to the iconic brands that still resonate globally. Losing this legacy, they argue, would be a profound cultural and economic loss, one that future generations would struggle to forgive. They frame the current crisis as a test of the government’s commitment to industrial renewal and green growth, questioning whether the UK has the vision and willpower to adapt to the challenges of the 21st century.

In conclusion, the opinion piece by David Bailey and Liam Byrne serves as both a warning and a rallying cry. The British automotive industry stands on the brink of collapse, battered by global trends and domestic inaction. Yet, with the right policies and leadership, there is still a chance to turn the tide. The authors implore Chancellor Rachel Reeves and the wider government to seize this moment, to invest in the future of the sector, and to ensure that the UK remains a player in the global automotive market. Failure to act, they caution, will not only jeopardize thousands of livelihoods but also diminish the nation’s industrial heritage and economic resilience. Their message is unequivocal: the time for bold action is now, before the tipping point becomes a point of no return. This urgent call to safeguard a vital industry resonates as a critical reminder of the stakes involved, not just for the automotive sector, but for the broader trajectory of the UK’s economic future in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven world.

Read the Full London Evening Standard Article at:
[ https://www.standard.co.uk/business/money/david-bailey-liam-byrne-mps-government-rachel-reeves-b1238336.html ]