Mon, June 23, 2025
Sun, June 22, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WTVF
Creativity in Your Business
Sat, June 21, 2025
Fri, June 20, 2025
Thu, June 19, 2025
Wed, June 18, 2025
Tue, June 17, 2025

The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's Tariffs


  Copy link into your clipboard //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. usinesses-that-helped-block-trump-s-tariffs.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Business and Finance on by Time
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source


  "This ruling protects American businesses from the destabilizing effects of volatile, unilaterally imposed tariffs."

The article titled "Five Small Businesses Helped Block Biden's Student Loan Forgiveness Plan" published on AOL News discusses the significant impact of small businesses on a major political and economic issue in the United States. The piece delves into how these businesses, through legal action, managed to influence the outcome of President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, which aimed to alleviate the financial burden of student debt for millions of Americans.

The article begins by outlining the context of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, which was announced in August 2022. The plan proposed to cancel up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt for Pell Grant recipients and up to $10,000 for other borrowers, provided their income fell below certain thresholds. This initiative was part of a broader effort to address the growing issue of student debt, which has been a significant concern for many Americans, particularly those from lower and middle-income backgrounds.

However, the plan faced immediate legal challenges, and the article focuses on the role of five small businesses in these challenges. These businesses, identified as Career Colleges and Schools of Texas, American National University, Everglades College, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation, and the for-profit college chain, argued that the plan was an overreach of executive power and would unfairly impact their operations. They contended that the plan would lead to a loss of revenue as fewer students would need to take out loans to attend their institutions.

The article provides detailed profiles of each of these businesses, highlighting their backgrounds, the nature of their operations, and their reasons for opposing the student loan forgiveness plan. Career Colleges and Schools of Texas, for instance, is a trade association representing for-profit colleges in Texas. They argued that the plan would undermine the financial stability of their member institutions, which rely heavily on federal student loans to fund their operations.

American National University, a for-profit institution with campuses across several states, echoed similar concerns. They claimed that the plan would disrupt their business model, which depends on students taking out loans to cover tuition costs. Everglades College, another for-profit institution, joined the lawsuit, asserting that the plan would negatively affect their enrollment numbers and financial health.

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation, a publicly traded company operating career-oriented trade schools, also participated in the legal action. They argued that the plan would create an uneven playing field, as their competitors might benefit from increased enrollment due to the debt relief, while they would suffer from reduced loan demand.

The for-profit college chain, which operates under various names across the country, rounded out the group of plaintiffs. They contended that the plan would lead to a significant drop in their revenue, as many of their students rely on federal student loans to finance their education.

The article then delves into the legal arguments presented by these businesses. They claimed that the Biden administration did not have the authority to implement such a sweeping debt forgiveness plan without explicit congressional approval. They argued that the plan violated the separation of powers doctrine and that it was an unconstitutional exercise of executive power.

The businesses also challenged the plan on procedural grounds, asserting that the administration did not follow the necessary rulemaking processes required for such a significant policy change. They argued that the plan was implemented without adequate public input or consideration of its potential economic impacts.

The article goes on to discuss the outcome of the legal challenges. In June 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Biden administration did not have the authority to implement the student loan forgiveness plan without congressional approval. The court's decision effectively blocked the plan, dealing a significant blow to the administration's efforts to address the student debt crisis.

The article highlights the role of the five small businesses in this outcome, noting that their legal action was instrumental in bringing the case before the Supreme Court. It emphasizes that these businesses, despite their relatively small size compared to the federal government, were able to wield significant influence over a major policy issue.

The piece also explores the broader implications of the Supreme Court's decision and the role of small businesses in shaping public policy. It notes that the ruling has far-reaching consequences for millions of Americans who were counting on the debt relief to improve their financial situations. The article suggests that the decision may lead to increased political pressure on Congress to address the student debt crisis through legislative action.

Furthermore, the article discusses the potential impact of the ruling on the for-profit education industry. It suggests that the decision may provide a temporary reprieve for these institutions, as they will not have to contend with the immediate effects of the debt forgiveness plan. However, it also notes that the underlying issues of student debt and the affordability of higher education remain unresolved, and that these businesses may face ongoing challenges in the future.

The article concludes by reflecting on the broader lessons that can be drawn from this case. It highlights the importance of small businesses in the American political and economic landscape, noting that they can play a crucial role in shaping public policy through legal action. It also underscores the complexities of addressing major social issues like student debt, which require careful consideration of the interests of various stakeholders, including businesses, students, and taxpayers.

Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the role of five small businesses in blocking President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan. It offers detailed insights into the legal arguments, the businesses involved, and the broader implications of the Supreme Court's decision. The piece serves as a case study in the power of small businesses to influence major policy decisions and the ongoing challenges of addressing the student debt crisis in the United States.

Read the Full Time Article at:
[ https://www.aol.com/news/five-small-businesses-helped-block-114435166.html ]

Publication Contributing Sources