Mon, June 23, 2025
Sun, June 22, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WTVF
Creativity in Your Business
Sat, June 21, 2025
Fri, June 20, 2025
Thu, June 19, 2025
Wed, June 18, 2025
Tue, June 17, 2025

New York Times Defends Report On Elon Musk's Drug Use, Says He's "Lashing Out Because He Doesn't Like Our Article"


  Copy link into your clipboard //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. ing-out-because-he-doesn-t-like-our-article.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Business and Finance on by Deadline
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source


  The New York Times defended its reporting on Elon Musk's drug use, after he claimed that the publication was "lying" in its article that claimed he was, among other things, "taking so much ketamine, a powerful anesthetic, that it was affecting his bladder, a known effect of chronic use. He took Ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms."

The article from Yahoo News, titled "New York Times Defends Report on Elon Musk's Twitter Takeover," delves into the controversy surrounding a New York Times report on Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter. The piece, written by Ryan Mac and published on August 23, 2023, sparked significant backlash from Musk and his supporters, leading to a robust defense from the New York Times.

The New York Times report, titled "Elon Musk's Twitter Takeover: A Timeline," aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the events leading up to and following Musk's acquisition of Twitter. The report detailed Musk's initial interest in the platform, his subsequent offer to buy it, the legal battles that ensued, and the eventual completion of the deal. It also covered the significant changes Musk implemented at Twitter, including layoffs, policy shifts, and the rebranding to X.

The controversy erupted when Musk took to his platform, X, to criticize the New York Times report, labeling it as "misleading" and "inaccurate." He accused the newspaper of having a "biased agenda" against him and claimed that the report omitted crucial information that would have painted a more favorable picture of his actions. Musk's tweet quickly went viral, garnering thousands of likes and retweets from his followers, many of whom echoed his sentiments and accused the New York Times of engaging in "fake news."

In response, the New York Times issued a statement defending the integrity of their report. The newspaper emphasized that the article was the result of extensive research and interviews with multiple sources, including former Twitter employees, legal experts, and industry insiders. They maintained that the report was factually accurate and provided a balanced account of the events surrounding Musk's acquisition of Twitter.

The New York Times also addressed Musk's specific criticisms, refuting his claims of bias and omission. They pointed out that the report included perspectives from both supporters and critics of Musk's actions, and that it covered a wide range of topics related to the acquisition, including the financial implications, the impact on Twitter's user base, and the legal challenges faced by Musk.

The newspaper further argued that their report was not intended to be a comprehensive biography of Musk or a detailed analysis of his business dealings, but rather a focused examination of the Twitter acquisition and its aftermath. They emphasized that the article was clearly labeled as a "timeline," indicating that it was meant to provide a chronological overview of the events rather than an exhaustive account of every detail.

The controversy surrounding the New York Times report has reignited the ongoing debate about the role of the media in covering high-profile figures like Elon Musk. Supporters of Musk argue that the media has a tendency to sensationalize stories and focus on negative aspects of his actions, while critics contend that the media has a responsibility to hold powerful individuals accountable and provide a critical perspective on their actions.

The New York Times' defense of their report has been met with mixed reactions. Some have praised the newspaper for standing up to Musk's criticism and defending the integrity of their journalism. Others have accused the New York Times of being dismissive of Musk's concerns and failing to address the specific issues he raised.

The controversy has also highlighted the challenges faced by journalists in the age of social media, where powerful individuals like Musk can easily reach a large audience and shape public opinion. The incident has raised questions about the influence of social media on the media landscape and the ability of traditional news outlets to maintain their credibility in the face of criticism from high-profile figures.

In the wake of the controversy, the New York Times has reaffirmed its commitment to journalistic integrity and its dedication to providing accurate and balanced reporting. The newspaper has stated that it will continue to cover Elon Musk and his business dealings, but that it will do so in a manner that is fair, objective, and based on factual evidence.

The incident has also sparked a broader discussion about the role of the media in covering powerful individuals and the challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity in the face of criticism and pressure. Some have argued that the media should be more cautious in its coverage of high-profile figures, while others contend that the media has a responsibility to hold powerful individuals accountable and provide a critical perspective on their actions.

The controversy surrounding the New York Times report on Elon Musk's Twitter takeover has also raised questions about the future of journalism and the role of social media in shaping public opinion. As social media platforms continue to grow in influence, the ability of traditional news outlets to maintain their credibility and reach their audiences may become increasingly challenging.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the New York Times report on Elon Musk's Twitter takeover has highlighted the ongoing tensions between the media and powerful individuals, the challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity in the age of social media, and the broader implications for the future of journalism. The incident has sparked a robust debate about the role of the media in covering high-profile figures and the importance of providing accurate and balanced reporting in the face of criticism and pressure.

Read the Full Deadline Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/york-times-defends-report-elon-151733870.html ]

Publication Contributing Sources