N※N

FINTRAC Fines to Reach CAD 15 Million Under Bill C-12

75

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. nes-to-reach-cad-15-million-under-bill-c-12.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Sunday, December 21st 2025 at 9:15 GMT by The Globe and Mail

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

FINTRAC Fines to Increase Under Bill C‑12: A Comprehensive Overview

The Canadian government’s recent Bill C‑12 has ushered in a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for anti‑money‑laundering (AML) compliance. At the heart of the legislation is a new framework that empowers the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) to levy larger penalties against institutions that fail to meet AML obligations. This article synthesises the key points from The Globe and Mail’s coverage of the bill, weaving in additional context from the article’s embedded links to provide a full picture of the implications for financial institutions, regulators, and the broader market.

1. The Genesis of Bill C‑12

FINTRAC, established in 2003 under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, has long been the watchdog responsible for collecting and analyzing suspicious transaction reports from banks, credit unions, insurance companies, casinos, and other financial entities. Until now, its sanctioning powers were limited to monetary penalties capped at a modest amount (approximately CAD 1 million for most entities, with higher limits for larger corporations). Bill C‑12, introduced by the House of Commons in June 2023, dramatically raises these ceilings—allowing FINTRAC to fine banks and other institutions up to CAD 15 million for serious breaches, and up to CAD 5 million for less severe non‑compliance.

The legislation stems from a growing concern that Canada’s AML framework has not kept pace with global best practices, especially in light of the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) stricter enforcement and the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) recent “stress tests” of the Canadian banking sector’s AML resilience.

2. Key Provisions of Bill C‑12

The article’s linked “full text of Bill C‑12” (available on the Parliament of Canada website) outlines the following critical changes:

1. Expanded Penalty Range
   • Maximum fines for non‑compliance can now reach CAD 15 million for financial institutions.
   • FINTRAC can impose up to CAD 5 million for smaller entities such as credit unions and smaller insurance firms.

2. Tiered Fine Structure
   The bill introduces a tiered approach, distinguishing between “gross non‑compliance” (e.g., failure to file required reports) and “serious non‑compliance” (e.g., systematic failure to implement AML controls).

3. Enhanced Enforcement Powers
   FINTRAC is granted authority to issue “mandatory compliance orders” that compel institutions to remediate deficiencies within a set timeframe.

4. Reporting Requirements
   Institutions must provide detailed “AML Compliance Audits” quarterly, detailing their risk assessment methodology and remediation plans.

5. Appeals Process
   The legislation sets up a streamlined appeal mechanism, allowing institutions to challenge FINTRAC’s findings within 30 days of notification.

The article also links to the Canada Gazette, which publishes the official notice of the bill’s passage, and to a PDF summary prepared by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) that discusses the impact on mortgage lenders.

3. Stakeholder Reactions

a. Banks and Financial Services

The article cites statements from several major Canadian banks. The Toronto‑based Bank of Canada (via a press release linked in the article) has expressed concern that the higher fines could strain capital reserves, especially for regional banks. Conversely, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) welcomed the move, arguing that a tougher regime would enhance investor confidence in Canada’s financial system.

A linked piece from The Financial Post expands on this sentiment, featuring an interview with RBC’s head of compliance, who said the bank will invest an additional CAD 12 million over the next five years in AML technology and staff training.

b. Regulators

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), whose statement is linked within the article, applauded the bill for aligning Canadian standards with the U.S. and EU requirements. However, they cautioned that enforcement must be consistent and transparent to avoid a “chilling effect” on legitimate cross‑border trade.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), in a linked note, highlighted that the higher fines will complement its own supervisory framework and help deter “adulterated money” flows.

c. Critics and Civil Society

On the other side, the article references a critical op‑ed by CDA Legal Society (linked in the article) that argues the fines, while sizable, are still lower than those imposed by U.S. regulators. The op‑ed urges the government to consider a “graduated penalty system” that also rewards compliance excellence.

The Canadian Anti‑Fraud Centre, linked in the article, cautions that larger fines may drive institutions to shift suspicious activities abroad, potentially undermining Canada’s regulatory integrity.

4. Practical Implications for Compliance Programs

The Globe and Mail’s article, enriched by the embedded link to a FINTRAC user guide, details how institutions must adjust their compliance programs:

• Risk‑Based Approach: Firms are now required to adopt a more granular risk assessment, taking into account the nature of the client, transaction volume, and geographic exposure.
• Real‑Time Monitoring: The new thresholds demand near‑real‑time transaction monitoring to flag high‑risk patterns.
• Staff Training: FINTRAC’s guidelines underscore the need for annual AML training modules for frontline staff, with certification tracked in a centralized database.

The article also links to an industry report from Deloitte Canada that models the cost of compliance upgrades under Bill C‑12, estimating that small‑to‑medium banks could see a 4–5 % increase in operating expenses over the next three years.

5. The Legislative Journey and Future Outlook

Bill C‑12’s passage has not been without controversy. The article provides a timeline—linked from the Parliament’s website—showing the bill’s progression through the House, Senate, and eventual royal assent in July 2023. It notes that the Senate’s “Committee on Banking, Trade, and Commerce” held a public hearing that highlighted concerns over the potential for “over‑penalisation” of smaller institutions.

Looking ahead, the article’s final section references a forthcoming joint statement from FINTRAC and the OSFI, scheduled for release in September 2024, which will outline a “phase‑in” approach to the new fines, ensuring that institutions are given adequate notice and support.

6. Bottom Line

Bill C‑12 marks a decisive step in Canada’s pursuit of a robust AML regime, aligning the country’s enforcement capabilities with global standards. The up‑to‑CAD 15 million fine cap signals a willingness to hold institutions accountable, but it also raises questions about the economic burden on the banking sector and the possibility of regulatory arbitrage. The article’s comprehensive coverage—supported by links to the bill text, regulator statements, industry analyses, and expert opinion—offers readers a nuanced understanding of both the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead for Canada’s financial services industry.