N※N

Ukraine's Maritime Offensive: Targeting Russian Oil Tankers to Cut Kremlin Cash Flow

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. ussian-oil-tankers-to-cut-kremlin-cash-flow.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Saturday, December 20th 2025 at 17:32 GMT by The Boston Globe

Ukraine’s New War‑On‑The‑Water Strategy: How Attacks on Russian Oil Tankers Could Re‑Shape the War Economy

On 20 December 2025 the Boston Globe published an in‑depth look at a series of high‑profile strikes on Russian oil tankers in the Black Sea, an operation that Ukraine has been using to try to undercut the Kremlin’s war‑financing engine. In a single post the Globe weaves together on‑scene reporting, expert analysis, and a handful of links that together paint a picture of a conflict that is now as much about cutting the flow of money as it is about artillery and air power.

1. The Black‑Sea Strikes: What Happened

The article opens with a vivid account of two Ukrainian drone strikes that hit the Russian tanker Rostov and the tanker Ural on 17 December. The first, carried out by the Ukrainian Navy’s newly‑acquired “Sparrow” anti‑ship missile system, blew a hole in Rostov’s hull and sent a plume of oil into the sea. The second strike, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) launch from a covert coastal base, damaged Ural’s fuel tanks and forced the ship to return to port for repairs.

Both tankers were flagged by the Russian Federation and were bound for the UAE‑based Sovereign Oil terminal in Dubai. According to the Globe’s own fact‑checking, the cargoes were worth roughly $1.8 billion in total – a substantial slice of the $25‑$30 billion that Russia reportedly earns from Black Sea oil each year.

2. Why Target Oil Tankers?

The article’s centerpiece is a discussion of why Ukraine is attacking oil tankers. Ukrainian officials say that Russia’s war budget is largely sustained by revenues from oil exports, especially the Black Sea‑borne shipments that bypass sanctions by transshipment through neutral flag states. By striking tankers in transit, Ukraine is trying to:

• Disrupt Cash Flow – Every tanker that is delayed or damaged loses days of shipping and must undergo costly repairs.
• Increase Insurance Premiums – Repeated incidents raise the cost of shipping risk insurance, making it more expensive for Russia to move its cargo.
• Signal to the West – Demonstrating the effectiveness of its maritime attacks encourages continued U.S. and EU support for Ukrainian naval upgrades.

The Globe’s article links to a Washington Post piece that details how the U.S. has supplied Ukraine with “Sparrow” missiles and other maritime counter‑measure kits. The link underscores how U.S. aid is not just about land‑based weapons but also about ensuring Ukraine can strike at the very lifeline of the Russian war machine.

3. The Financial Back‑Story: How Russia Rises, How it Falls

The Boston Globe takes a detour into the economics of war, linking to an earlier Globe piece titled “Russia’s War‑Financing 101.” That article explains that, while sanctions have frozen trillions of dollars in Russian assets, the Kremlin still relies on oil exports to meet its military expenses. Black Sea ports, under the “Unrestricted Warfare” doctrine, have been used to ship crude and refined products to ports in Turkey, Azerbaijan, and other states that do not impose sanctions.

The new link to an International Monetary Fund (IMF) report explains that a 10 % reduction in Black Sea oil exports could cut Russia’s budget by up to $3 billion annually, a figure that would strain its ability to finance new weaponry or maintain the front‑line troops in the Donbas and the south.

4. Global Implications

The article discusses the ripple effects of the strikes. For the United Arab Emirates, a major buyer of Russian oil, the incidents raised concerns about the security of its supply chain. The U.S. Treasury Department’s sanctions on “transshipment vessels” have already made it risky for UAE entities to process Russian cargoes, and the new attacks may accelerate a shift to alternative suppliers such as Saudi Arabia or Qatar.

The Globe’s report cites an interview with an energy‑economics professor from Oxford, who warned that a prolonged disruption of Black Sea oil could push up global oil prices, destabilise fragile economies in Africa, and create a vacuum that Russia might attempt to fill by turning to other, less‑restricted markets.

5. Russian Response

Russia’s official response, captured in a brief statement from the State Duma, framed the attacks as “provocation” and vowed to “tighten security” around its maritime assets. The Globe points out that the Kremlin has already begun to re‑flag its oil tankers under the neutral flags of Panama and the Marshall Islands, a move that complicates international sanctions enforcement.

The article links to a recent Reuters story on the Kremlin’s plan to purchase “high‑altitude anti‑ship missiles” from China, suggesting that Moscow may be looking to counter the new Ukrainian maritime threat with advanced defense technology.

6. Analysis: Is Ukraine Winning?

The Boston Globe offers a balanced view. On the one hand, Ukraine’s attacks have disrupted at least 18 % of the oil that would otherwise have reached international markets during the month of December. On the other hand, analysts caution that the Black Sea is a shallow, heavily monitored area, and that Russia’s navy can deploy counter‑measure drones to neutralise future strikes. Moreover, the total monetary impact may be modest compared to the overall budget of the Russian war machine, especially if Russia can redirect oil to alternative routes.

Still, the article argues that Ukraine’s maritime operations are a strategic “game changer” because they demonstrate that the U.S. and EU are willing to fund capabilities that directly undermine the Kremlin’s economic lifeline. This has emboldened Kyiv’s leadership and increased the pressure on European governments to keep providing financial and technological support.

7. Where to Go Next

The article ends by pointing readers toward a collection of related links:

• “Sparrow” Missiles – Technical Details – a Defense One analysis of the missile’s range, payload, and deployment.
• Sanctions on Russian Oil – How They Work – an explainer from the European Union’s official website.
• Global Oil Markets – What It Means for Your Gas Bill – a Bloomberg piece that translates the conflict into consumer price terms.

By weaving together on‑scene reportage, economic data, and expert commentary, the Boston Globe offers a concise yet comprehensive summary of a developing chapter in the Ukraine war. The article underscores that the fight is no longer confined to the trenches; it is also waged on the waters that carry the very funds the war needs to survive.