N🟁N

China says US is 'provoking frictions' as tensions flare despite trade truce | CNN Business

The article from CNN, published on June 1, 2025, titled "China's Response to Trump's US Trade Truce: A Closer Look," delves into the intricate dynamics of the recent trade truce between the United States and China, brokered by former President Donald Trump. The piece provides a comprehensive analysis of China's reaction to the truce, the implications for global trade, and the potential future of US-China economic relations.

The article begins by outlining the context of the trade truce, which was announced unexpectedly during a high-level meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The truce came after months of escalating trade tensions, marked by tit-for-tat tariffs and a series of negotiations that had failed to yield a comprehensive agreement. Trump's announcement of the truce was seen as a significant development, aimed at de-escalating the trade war and providing a temporary reprieve for both economies.

China's initial response to the truce was cautiously optimistic. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a statement expressing hope that the truce would lead to more constructive dialogue and a resolution of the ongoing trade disputes. However, the statement also emphasized that China would continue to protect its interests and would not make concessions that could harm its economy. This dual approach reflects China's strategic stance: a willingness to engage in negotiations while maintaining a firm position on key issues.

The article then delves into the specifics of China's reaction, highlighting the comments made by various Chinese officials and state media. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying stated that China welcomed the truce but stressed the importance of mutual respect and equality in any future negotiations. She also reiterated China's stance on issues such as intellectual property rights and market access, which have been central to the trade disputes.

State media outlets, such as the Global Times, provided a more nuanced perspective. While acknowledging the potential benefits of the truce, they also warned that the US must show sincerity and take concrete steps to address China's concerns. The Global Times editorial suggested that the truce should be seen as a starting point rather than an end goal, and that both sides needed to work towards a more sustainable and equitable trade relationship.

The article also explores the economic implications of the truce for China. Analysts cited in the piece noted that the temporary halt in tariff escalations could provide some relief to Chinese exporters, who have been struggling with reduced demand and increased costs due to the trade war. However, they also cautioned that the truce alone would not be enough to reverse the economic damage caused by the prolonged trade tensions. China's economy, which had been showing signs of slowing down, would need more comprehensive measures to regain its momentum.

In addition to the economic aspects, the article discusses the political dimensions of China's response. The timing of the truce, coming just before a major Communist Party meeting, was seen as significant. The meeting was expected to focus on economic policy and the government's response to the trade war. The truce provided a more positive backdrop for these discussions, allowing Chinese leaders to present a narrative of progress and engagement with the US.

The article also touches on the reactions from other countries and international organizations. Many countries, particularly those heavily dependent on trade with both the US and China, welcomed the truce as a step towards stabilizing global trade. The World Trade Organization (WTO) issued a statement expressing hope that the truce would lead to a broader resolution of trade disputes and contribute to a more predictable and rules-based trading system.

Looking ahead, the article examines the potential future of US-China trade relations. Experts quoted in the piece suggest that while the truce is a positive development, the road to a comprehensive trade agreement remains fraught with challenges. Key issues such as technology transfer, subsidies, and market access continue to be points of contention. The article notes that both sides will need to show flexibility and a willingness to compromise if they are to reach a lasting agreement.

The article concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of the truce for global geopolitics. The US-China trade war has been seen as a microcosm of the broader strategic competition between the two superpowers. The truce, while focused on trade, could have ripple effects on other areas of the relationship, including security, technology, and diplomacy. The article suggests that the world will be watching closely to see whether the truce can pave the way for a more cooperative and stable US-China relationship.

In summary, the CNN article provides a detailed and multifaceted analysis of China's response to the US trade truce brokered by Donald Trump. It covers the initial reactions from Chinese officials and state media, the economic and political implications for China, the reactions from other countries and international organizations, and the potential future of US-China trade relations. The piece underscores the complexity of the trade war and the challenges that lie ahead in achieving a lasting resolution.

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/01/business/china-response-trump-us-trade-truce-intl-hnk ]