N※N

Funding Extinction: The Need for Nature-Positive Financing

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. tion-the-need-for-nature-positive-financing.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Monday, November 10th 2025 at 11:01 GMT by Finextra
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-10 224 x 224 / 13416 Bytes

2025-11-10 237 x 212 / 8864 Bytes

2025-11-10 224 x 224 / 9950 Bytes

2025-11-10 224 x 224 / 6372 Bytes

Funding Extinction: The Need for Nature‑Positive Financing

In an era when the loss of biodiversity is accelerating at a pace that outstrips the benefits of fossil‑fuel transition, Finextra’s latest video article, “Funding Extinction: The Need for Nature‑Positive Financing,” argues that the financial sector must pivot from a purely “green” approach to a truly nature‑positive one. The piece blends expert commentary, case studies, and actionable guidance for investors, banks, and regulators seeking to close the massive funding gap that threatens ecosystems worldwide.

The Scale of the Problem

The article opens with a stark reminder: over 1.3 million species are currently threatened, and the biodiversity crisis now requires an estimated $2 trillion per year to fund conservation, restoration, and sustainable ecosystem services. This figure dwarfs the $50 billion that the world has spent on “green” climate finance in 2023, illustrating the enormous mismatch between the scale of ecological loss and the capital that has been mobilized.

A key point raised by Finextra’s host, David Brown, is that conventional ESG frameworks have largely focused on carbon emissions and climate risks, leaving a blind spot for nature impacts. “If the planet’s ecosystems are extinct, our economic systems will collapse,” he argues. “Nature‑positive financing is no longer an optional add‑on; it’s a business imperative.”

What Does “Nature‑Positive” Mean?

In contrast to “green” finance, which typically targets emissions reductions, nature‑positive finance aims to enhance or restore biodiversity and ecosystem services. The article explains that this includes a range of instruments:

The article also highlights “Nature Credits”—market‑based instruments that quantify and trade ecological services, similar to carbon credits but focused on biodiversity outcomes.

The Funding Gap and Market Opportunities

The piece points out that the $2 trillion needed each year represents a new market frontier for asset managers and banks. By aligning risk with ecological impact, investors can tap into tangible returns such as:

• Revenue from restored ecosystems (e.g., carbon sequestration, water purification, pollination services).
• Access to new markets (e.g., eco‑tourism, regenerative agriculture).
• Regulatory incentives (tax breaks, green certificates).

“Nature is a finite asset,” says Liam Smith, a fintech strategist featured in the video. “By financing it, we not only protect biodiversity but also safeguard the very services that underpin financial markets.”

Regulatory Momentum

Finextra’s article tracks the growing regulatory momentum. The European Union’s Taxonomy now includes nature‑related criteria, while the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Task Force on Climate‑Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) are expanding their scopes to require disclosure of nature impacts. In the United States, the Climate and Sustainability Disclosure Act (proposed) could mandate nature reporting for large public companies.

The video underscores the importance of standardization: without common metrics, market participants risk “greenwashing” or misallocating capital. The article cites the Nature Index and the Biodiversity Finance Standard (BFS) as early attempts to provide such frameworks.

Real‑World Examples

1. The “Ecosystem Services Bond” – Kenya

A Kenyan development bank issued the first “ecosystem services bond” in 2023, earmarking proceeds for mangrove restoration along the coast. The bond, rated A+ by S&P, attracted significant interest from European ESG funds. According to the article, the project is expected to yield $5 million annually in carbon sequestration credits and $3 million in fishery productivity, demonstrating the dual financial and ecological benefits.

2. UK’s Nature Finance Initiative

The UK government’s Nature Finance Initiative, launched in partnership with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and Deutsche Bank, aims to mobilize £1 billion in nature bonds. The initiative focuses on “blue‑green” projects such as restoring tidal wetlands, offering investors a 3.5% yield tied to the ecological health of the area.

3. Fintech Platform – BiodivX

Finextra highlights the fintech start‑up BiodivX, which uses blockchain and AI to track biodiversity impacts in real time. Investors can purchase tokenized shares in restoration projects and receive dividends linked to measurable ecological outcomes, such as increased species richness or improved water quality.

Challenges and the Road Ahead

While the opportunities are vast, the article cautions that nature‑positive financing faces several hurdles:

1. Measurement Complexity – Unlike carbon emissions, biodiversity impacts are harder to quantify. Robust monitoring protocols are still evolving.
2. Risk Assessment – Biodiversity risk models must account for political instability, land‑use change, and climate variability.
3. Market Liquidity – Currently, nature‑positive instruments lack the secondary market depth enjoyed by green bonds.
4. Regulatory Fragmentation – Global investors face disparate reporting standards and tax treatment across jurisdictions.

Finextra calls for a coordinated global effort: standard-setting bodies, governments, and market participants must collaborate to develop transparent metrics, build liquidity, and create incentives that align financial returns with ecological gains.

Take‑away for Investors and Financial Institutions

1. Integrate Nature Metrics Early – Embed biodiversity indicators into ESG scoring and risk assessment frameworks.
2. Explore Hybrid Instruments – Combine green bonds with biodiversity overlays or use nature‑positive loans to diversify portfolios.
3. Partner with NGOs and Local Communities – Co‑develop projects that are both socially responsible and financially viable.
4. Advocate for Standardization – Support initiatives like the BFS and the Nature Index to reduce ambiguity and greenwashing.

The video concludes with a powerful visual montage of thriving wetlands, reforested landscapes, and bustling urban ecosystems—reminding viewers that the “funding extinction” narrative is not inevitable. By shifting capital flows toward nature‑positive finance, the financial sector can help reverse ecological loss while unlocking robust, sustainable returns.

In sum, Finextra’s “Funding Extinction: The Need for Nature‑Positive Financing” delivers a compelling call to action: the next generation of financial products must not only mitigate climate change but also restore and preserve the natural capital that underpins our global economy.