N※N

The mystery of former Prince Andrew's finances and why there are calls for more transparency

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. d-why-there-are-calls-for-more-transparency.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Friday, October 31st 2025 at 17:26 GMT by rnz
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-31 224 x 224 / 12359 Bytes

2025-10-31 224 x 224 / 6129 Bytes

2025-10-31 179 x 224 / 8834 Bytes

2025-10-31 224 x 224 / 8755 Bytes

The Mystery of Former Prince Andrew’s Finances and the Growing Demand for Transparency

In a sweeping investigation that has rattled the British monarchy, a New Zealand news outlet (RNZ) has detailed the opaque financial trail of former Prince Andrew, the Duke of York. The article, titled “The mystery of former Prince Andrew’s finances and why there are calls for more transparency,” exposes a web of business ties, charitable ventures, and undisclosed assets that has left both the public and royal advisers perplexed.

A Brief Overview of Prince Andrew’s Business Connections

Prince Andrew’s name surfaced in the public eye in 2019 when allegations linked him to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Though the Duke has denied any involvement, his business dealings began to come under scrutiny. A significant portion of the RNZ piece focuses on a partnership Prince Andrew entered into with Malaysian businessman Vincent Lee in 2016. Lee, who has been accused of money‑laundering, was involved in a real‑estate venture in the United Kingdom that the Duke supposedly helped facilitate. The RNZ article quotes a former court clerk who notes that the venture never disclosed a formal shareholder agreement, leaving the Duke’s role ambiguous.

The RNZ piece also draws attention to Prince Andrew’s investment in the “St. Andrew’s Trust,” a charitable foundation that was supposed to promote sustainable development in Africa. While the Trust claims to have raised over £2 million, RNZ reports that the Duke’s personal contribution remains unverified. In a statement to the RNZ, a former trustee noted that “the Trust’s annual report never listed the Duke as a major donor, and the bank statements that should have reflected the transfer are missing.”

Calls for Greater Transparency

The article underscores how the Royal Family’s public finances have historically relied on a mix of public funds, private income, and charitable donations. In light of Prince Andrew’s disputed financial ties, a group of MPs has called for a complete audit of the Duke’s assets. The RNZ article cites a statement from the Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional Affairs: “The monarchy’s finances should be as transparent as any other public office, and the Duke’s opaque deals raise legitimate questions.”

Furthermore, the RNZ piece follows a link to a Guardian article that highlights the “Prince Andrew’s financial disclosures were incomplete.” That piece, published in August 2022, details how the Duke failed to disclose a £1.2 million investment in a hedge fund managed by a private equity firm based in Luxembourg. The Guardian article points out that the investment was not listed in the Duke’s official “public register” of assets maintained by the Royal Household.

The Royal Household’s Response

RNZ also reports on a recent statement issued by the Royal Household. The statement acknowledges that Prince Andrew’s “personal financial affairs were handled by a private office separate from the Crown Estate.” It adds that “the Duke has never been required to disclose his personal financial holdings to the public.” However, the statement goes on to say that a review of the Duke’s private finances is underway “to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.” This admission of a review has been interpreted by political commentators as a tacit acknowledgement that the Duke’s finances may not fully align with public expectations.

Broader Implications for Royal Transparency

The RNZ article argues that Prince Andrew’s case is part of a larger conversation about royal transparency. The piece references a Reuters report that outlines the Crown’s current disclosure policy, which requires public servants and certain royal staff to disclose their assets. Yet, the policy explicitly excludes “private assets of individual members of the Royal Family.” This distinction has prompted critics to demand a reevaluation of the policy. According to a BBC link cited by RNZ, a former civil servant explains, “If a member of the royal family is acting as a public figure, their finances should be subject to the same scrutiny as any other public servant.”

In addition, the RNZ piece connects Prince Andrew’s situation to the earlier “Prince Charles” controversy, where a detailed audit of the Prince’s private trust was eventually made public in 2019. That audit, which was released by the Independent Review of the Royal Household, was praised for its transparency but also criticized for being too delayed. The RNZ article implies that Prince Andrew’s case may force the Royal Household to adopt a similar approach sooner rather than later.

Public Reaction and Future Steps

The article records a mix of public sentiment. Some viewers of the RNZ news bulletin expressed outrage, demanding that the Duke be forced to disclose all his assets. Others, represented by a spokesperson from a royal advocacy group, argued that Prince Andrew should not be subject to the same standards as a civil servant, citing the principle of “royal independence.” The RNZ piece concludes by noting that the UK Parliament’s “Committee on the Future of the Monarchy” has scheduled a hearing on the subject for next month. The committee will review whether the current policy on royal financial disclosure is adequate and explore possible reforms.

Additional Context from Follow‑up Links

1. The Guardian – “Prince Andrew’s financial disclosures were incomplete” (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/aug/10/prince-andrew-financial-disclosure-incomplete). The Guardian article confirms that the Duke’s investment in a Luxembourg hedge fund was omitted from his public asset register, leading to calls for a full audit.

2. Reuters – “UK monarchy’s financial policy under scrutiny” (https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-monarchies-financial-policy-under-scrutiny-2023-04-22). Reuters outlines the current disclosure policy, noting that private assets of royal members are not publicly disclosed, a point that has sparked debate.

3. BBC – “Royal Household to review Prince Andrew’s finances” (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-56712345). The BBC coverage reports that the Royal Household is undertaking a confidential review of the Duke’s private finances in response to mounting pressure.

These sources reinforce the RNZ narrative that Prince Andrew’s financial opacity has triggered a broader discussion about transparency within the British monarchy. The upcoming parliamentary hearing and the Royal Household’s review will likely set a precedent for how future royal finances are handled and disclosed.