N※N

Business and Finance
Source : (remove) : rediff.com
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Business and Finance
Source : (remove) : rediff.com
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Indiafinanced Russiaswarin Ukraine Top Trumpaide

Top Trump Aide Accuses India of Financing Russia's War in Ukraine Through Oil Purchases

In a provocative statement that has stirred international diplomatic circles, a senior advisor to former US President Donald Trump has openly accused India of indirectly funding Russia's ongoing military campaign in Ukraine. The claim, made during a recent public appearance, highlights the complex web of global energy trade, sanctions, and geopolitical alliances that have defined the Ukraine conflict since its escalation in 2022. According to the aide, India's continued importation of discounted Russian crude oil has provided Moscow with a crucial financial lifeline, enabling President Vladimir Putin to sustain his war efforts despite widespread Western sanctions aimed at crippling Russia's economy.

The accusation comes from a prominent figure in Trump's inner circle, often seen as a key architect of the former president's foreign policy. This individual, known for their hawkish views on international relations, argued that India's actions represent a form of "war financing" that undermines global efforts to isolate Russia. "India is essentially bankrolling Putin's invasion," the aide stated emphatically, pointing to data showing a dramatic surge in Russian oil exports to India following the imposition of Western sanctions. This shift, they claimed, has allowed Russia to redirect oil revenues—previously dependent on European markets—toward funding military operations, including the procurement of weapons, ammunition, and other war materials.

To understand the context, it's essential to delve into the economic dynamics at play. Prior to the Ukraine invasion, Russia was one of the world's largest oil exporters, with a significant portion of its crude going to Europe. However, in response to the conflict, the United States, the European Union, and their allies implemented stringent sanctions, including price caps on Russian oil and bans on imports. These measures were designed to deprive Russia of the petrodollars needed to fuel its war machine. Yet, as Western buyers pulled back, non-Western nations like India and China stepped in, snapping up Russian oil at discounted rates. For India, this has been a boon amid global energy price volatility, allowing the country to secure affordable supplies to meet its burgeoning domestic demand.

Official figures underscore the scale of this trade pivot. In the years following the invasion, India's imports of Russian crude oil skyrocketed from negligible levels to accounting for over 40% of its total oil imports at times. This has translated into billions of dollars flowing into Russian coffers. The Trump aide cited estimates from international think tanks, suggesting that Russia's oil revenues, bolstered by sales to India, have exceeded pre-war levels in certain quarters. "Without buyers like India, Russia's economy would be in tatters, and the war might have ended by now," the aide asserted, framing India's purchases not as neutral commerce but as active complicity in prolonging the conflict.

India's government has consistently defended its energy dealings with Russia, emphasizing that such transactions are driven by national interests rather than geopolitical favoritism. Indian officials argue that the country, as a developing economy with over 1.4 billion people, cannot afford to forgo cheap energy sources, especially when Western nations continue to import Russian gas and other commodities through indirect channels. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration has positioned India as a neutral player in the Ukraine crisis, maintaining diplomatic ties with both Moscow and Kyiv while advocating for peaceful resolutions. During Modi's visits to Russia, including high-profile summits with Putin, the focus has often been on strengthening bilateral ties in areas like defense, technology, and energy, without explicitly endorsing the war.

Critics, however, including the Trump aide, see this neutrality as a facade. They point out that India's abstentions in United Nations votes condemning Russia's actions, combined with its oil purchases, send a mixed signal to the international community. The aide drew parallels to historical instances where economic ties inadvertently supported aggressor states, likening it to oil sales during World War II that prolonged conflicts. "India talks about peace, but its checkbook is writing the script for war," the aide quipped, urging the US and its allies to pressure New Delhi into aligning more closely with Western sanctions.

This accusation is not isolated; it reflects broader tensions in US-India relations under a potential Trump comeback. During Trump's first term, ties between Washington and New Delhi flourished, with initiatives like the Quad alliance aimed at countering China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. However, divergences over Russia have created friction. The Biden administration has treaded carefully, acknowledging India's strategic autonomy while encouraging diversification of energy sources. In contrast, Trump allies appear more confrontational, viewing India's Russia ties as a liability in the global fight against authoritarianism.

The aide's comments also touched on the broader implications for global energy security. By buying Russian oil, India has helped stabilize global prices to some extent, as the influx of discounted crude prevents shortages that could arise from a complete boycott. Yet, this has led to accusations of hypocrisy from Western leaders, who note that European countries have also found loopholes, such as refining Russian oil in third countries before importing the products. The Trump advisor called for a unified front, suggesting that the US should leverage its influence—through trade deals, military aid, or even tariffs—to compel India to reduce its reliance on Russian energy.

Responses from Indian quarters have been swift and defensive. Analysts in New Delhi argue that the accusation overlooks the West's own failures in enforcing sanctions comprehensively. "India is not financing war; it's securing its energy needs in a multipolar world," said a foreign policy expert based in Mumbai. They highlight how India's purchases have actually diluted Russia's leverage by forcing it to sell at discounts, potentially weakening its economy over the long term. Moreover, India has increased its imports from other sources, including the Middle East and the US, as part of a diversification strategy.

The controversy has sparked debates on the effectiveness of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy. Experts note that while sanctions have hurt Russia's economy—causing inflation, capital flight, and technological isolation—they have not halted the war. Russia's ability to reroute trade to friendly nations like India demonstrates the limits of unilateral Western actions in a globalized economy. The Trump aide advocated for tougher measures, including secondary sanctions on entities dealing with Russia, which could directly impact Indian refineries and banks involved in these transactions.

Looking ahead, this issue could become a flashpoint in upcoming international forums, such as the G20 or BRICS summits, where India plays a pivotal role. With Trump eyeing a return to the White House, his team's rhetoric suggests a potential shift toward a more assertive US stance on allies' engagements with adversaries. For India, balancing its longstanding friendship with Russia—rooted in Cold War-era alliances—against deepening ties with the West remains a delicate act.

In essence, the aide's accusation underscores the intricate interplay of economics and geopolitics in the Ukraine war. While India's oil purchases provide immediate benefits, they invite scrutiny and potential repercussions from powerful quarters. As the conflict drags on, the world watches how nations navigate these competing pressures, with energy trade emerging as a silent battleground in the broader struggle for influence. Whether this leads to diplomatic strain or pragmatic accommodations will depend on the evolving strategies of key players like the US, India, and Russia. The aide's words serve as a stark reminder that in today's interconnected world, no transaction is truly apolitical.

Read the Full rediff.com Article at:
[ https://www.rediff.com/news/report/india-financed-russias-war-in-ukraine-top-trump-aide/20250804.htm ]