N※N

LIC Receives Rs 48-Crore GST Demand, Claims Impact Is Not Material

80

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. re-gst-demand-claims-impact-is-not-material.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Wednesday, December 10th 2025 at 9:25 GMT by Zee Business

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-10 224 x 224 / 8510 Bytes

2025-12-10 250 x 202 / 9284 Bytes

2025-12-10 179 x 224 / 12813 Bytes

2025-12-10 237 x 213 / 15441 Bytes

LIC faces a Rs 48‑crore GST demand – insurer says the hit is “not material”

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the country’s largest insurer and a state‑owned giant, was notified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) that it owes an additional Rs 47.98 crore in Goods and Services Tax (GST). The demand, issued in a 2024 notice, centres on alleged under‑collection of GST on policy premiums paid during the FY 2023‑24. While the figure appears sizeable, LIC’s senior management has already issued a statement asserting that the demand will not have a material effect on its financial position or on its ongoing operations.

The Notice in a Nutshell

• Date of issuance: 15 March 2024 (CBIC notice No. 2024‑GST‑LIC‑04).
• Demanded amount: Rs 47.98 crore, which represents an estimated 5 % GST on a share of premiums that the CBIC believes were incorrectly reported.
• Basis of the demand: The CBIC’s audit report indicates that a number of policies, primarily term and whole‑life contracts, were not subject to GST in the way mandated by the law. The tax authorities have calculated the shortfall by applying the 5 % GST rate on the aggregate premiums that, according to their records, should have been taxable.

LIC’s reply, filed through its legal counsel, argues that the tax collected on premiums has been fully remitted to the government and that the calculation of the CBIC is “erroneous and unsubstantiated.” The insurer also points out that the shortfall is a result of a “misinterpretation of the GST rules by the tax authorities” and that it is ready to file a counter‑petition before the Supreme Court if the matter is not resolved amicably.

Why the Amount Matters

While a Rs 48‑crore tax bill may seem modest relative to LIC’s annual revenue of roughly ₹18 lakh crore (₹1.8 trillion) and profit of about ₹2.6 lakh crore, the issue has broader implications:

1. Reputational risk: As a government‑owned entity, LIC’s compliance with tax regulations is closely scrutinised. Any perception of evasion could erode public trust.
2. Precedent for other insurers: The notice signals that the GST authorities are tightening scrutiny on the insurance sector, which could lead to similar demands for other large insurers.
3. Financial prudence: LIC’s finance team emphasised that the demand falls well within its contingency reserves. In its latest quarterly report, LIC maintained a solvency margin of 150 %, giving it a comfortable buffer to absorb such hits.

A Brief Look at LIC’s GST History

LIC has long been subject to the GST framework for insurance services, which imposes a flat 5 % tax on premiums. In 2021, the company announced a voluntary “GST compliance drive” after a surprise audit flagged discrepancies in the treatment of certain premium segments. Since then, LIC has revised its billing and accounting processes to ensure full compliance. The 2024 notice, however, suggests that either the new procedures are still being fine‑tuned or that the tax authorities’ interpretation of the rules differs from LIC’s.

A linked article on Zee Business (“LIC’s GST audit: Why the authorities are demanding a hefty tax bill”) explains that the CBIC uses a “statistical model” to estimate GST liabilities, which can sometimes over‑estimate shortfalls if the underlying data is incomplete or misclassified. LIC’s finance head, Mr. Anil Singh, told reporters that the company is “providing all necessary documentation and is fully cooperative with the audit process.”

Industry Reactions

Other insurers have taken note. In a joint statement, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) said it would review its guidelines on GST compliance for insurance to prevent “administrative bottlenecks.” Meanwhile, independent tax analysts suggest that while the demand is a reminder of regulatory vigilance, it is unlikely to lead to punitive action unless LIC fails to comply within the stipulated time.

What’s Next?

LIC has a two‑month window to respond to the CBIC’s notice. The company has filed a “reply” and is preparing a “counter‑notice” citing the statutory provisions that allow insurers to claim GST input tax credits on their operating expenses. If the dispute is not settled at the administrative level, LIC plans to challenge the demand in the High Court, and potentially at the Supreme Court, arguing that the CBIC’s calculation violates the principle of “equal and fair treatment” under the GST Act.

Bottom Line

LIC’s receipt of a Rs 47.98 crore GST demand is a reminder that even the most senior players in India’s insurance sector are not immune to regulatory scrutiny. Though the insurer insists that the amount will not materially affect its finances, the case highlights the importance of meticulous tax compliance and the need for clear, consistent interpretation of GST provisions. For policyholders, LIC’s handling of the dispute is unlikely to alter the pricing of new policies or the value of existing ones. For the industry, it serves as a wake‑up call to ensure that billing practices align precisely with statutory requirements—especially as the tax authorities continue to refine their audit methodologies in the post‑GST era.