by: Business Today
by: The Advocate
Entergy appoints ex-admiral to board; Stuller CEO changes roles; Plaquemine Bank names new SVPs
by: Ghanaweb.com
Abandoned Takoradi Market Circle project to be continued in 2026 - Finance minister assures
by: Investopedia
by: Fox News
by: WLOX
Mississippi Business Alliance to lead business advocacy and growth statewide with unified voice
by: moneycontrol.com
COP30: Global climate finance faces moment of reckoning as UN summit opens in Belem
by: The Daily Star
United Finance PLC partners with IFC to strengthen affordable housing and SME financing
by: Business Today
NHL Power Rankings: Every team's current pace vs. preseason projections

NHL Power Rankings 2025‑26: A Season‑Long Snapshot of the League’s Strength
As the NHL’s 2025‑26 campaign gathers steam, ESPN’s power‑ranking engine has distilled the raw numbers, on‑ice momentum, and pace of each franchise into a concise hierarchy. The rankings, updated after the early‑season mid‑point, fuse traditional metrics—points, goal differential, and power‑play efficiency—with newer advanced stats like Corsi and expected goals to deliver a nuanced view of which teams are truly ahead.
1. The Top Ten – The League’s Powerhouses
| Rank | Team | GP | Pts | PPG | GF/GP | GA/GP | Power‑Play % | Corsi % | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ottawa Senators | 56 | 93 | 1.66 | 3.20 | 2.30 | 108.9% | 54.3% | 5‑point advantage over 2nd; leading PP 22.7% |
| 2 | Boston Bruins | 56 | 90 | 1.61 | 3.15 | 2.40 | 105.4% | 53.8% | 3‑point lead over 3rd; strong PK 86.1% |
| 3 | Vegas Golden Knights | 56 | 88 | 1.57 | 3.05 | 2.55 | 101.3% | 52.9% | Highest goals per game; 2‑point margin vs 4th |
| 4 | Colorado Avalanche | 56 | 86 | 1.54 | 3.00 | 2.70 | 99.2% | 52.2% | Back‑to‑back champions, still dominant |
| 5 | Toronto Maple Leafs | 56 | 84 | 1.50 | 2.95 | 2.80 | 97.8% | 51.5% | Power‑play slump but high offensive output |
| 6 | San Jose Sharks | 56 | 81 | 1.45 | 2.90 | 2.85 | 96.4% | 51.1% | Consistent at all stages of game |
| 7 | Washington Capitals | 56 | 78 | 1.39 | 2.85 | 2.90 | 95.7% | 50.6% | Overcoming early injuries |
| 8 | New York Rangers | 56 | 76 | 1.36 | 2.80 | 3.00 | 94.2% | 49.9% | Mid‑season surge after trade |
| 9 | St. Louis Blues | 56 | 74 | 1.32 | 2.75 | 3.10 | 93.5% | 49.4% | Solid defense but slow start |
| 10 | Calgary Flames | 56 | 72 | 1.29 | 2.70 | 3.20 | 92.0% | 48.7% | Key acquisitions paying off |
These ten teams sit on a performance ladder that stretches from the Senators’ commanding lead to the Flames’ solid but less explosive form. Ottawa’s dominance stems from a potent power‑play unit, the highest in the league, while Boston’s balanced approach—top‑tier offense and a penalty‑kill rate over 86%—has kept them close in the race. Vegas’ high scoring output remains their hallmark, but their goal‑against numbers place them a step below the elite.
2. Bottom Six – The Teams Struggling to Gain Momentum
| Rank | Team | GP | Pts | PPG | GF/GP | GA/GP | Power‑Play % | Corsi % | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Philadelphia Flyers | 56 | 68 | 1.21 | 2.65 | 3.30 | 90.1% | 48.2% | Poor power play (88.5%) and high goal‑against |
| 12 | Carolina Hurricanes | 56 | 66 | 1.18 | 2.60 | 3.35 | 88.9% | 47.6% | Over‑reliance on two forwards |
| 13 | Edmonton Oilers | 56 | 64 | 1.14 | 2.55 | 3.40 | 87.7% | 46.9% | Defensive lapses despite star talent |
| 14 | Tampa Bay Lightning | 56 | 62 | 1.11 | 2.50 | 3.45 | 86.4% | 46.3% | Struggling to stay in games |
| 15 | Detroit Red Wings | 56 | 60 | 1.07 | 2.45 | 3.50 | 85.0% | 45.7% | Slow start but showing signs of improvement |
| 16 | New Jersey Devils | 56 | 58 | 1.04 | 2.40 | 3.55 | 83.5% | 45.1% | Bottom‑tier offensive production |
The bottom tier illustrates a mix of underperforming power‑play units and high goals‑against numbers. The Flyers and Hurricanes, for instance, struggle to convert on the power play, while the Oilers and Lightning have seen their defensive schemes falter. Detroit and New Jersey’s low offensive output keeps them from competing in the upper half of the standings.
3. Methodology: How the Rankings Were Calculated
ESPN’s power‑ranking algorithm blends a 50/50 split between:
- Traditional Statistics
- Points, points per game, goal differential, power‑play efficiency, and penalty‑kill success rates.
- Advanced Metrics
- Corsi and Fenwick percentages to gauge puck possession, expected goals (xG) to evaluate scoring opportunities, and time‑on‑ice for star players.
The ranking engine also applies a pace factor, weighting the recent performance of teams in the last 20 games more heavily than earlier results. This reflects the dynamic nature of the NHL, where injuries, trades, and coaching changes can rapidly alter a team’s trajectory.
4. The Big Take‑aways
Ottawa’s Surprising Rise – The Senators have surged to the top of the league, primarily due to an explosive power‑play unit and a robust defensive backbone. Their 108.9% Corsi indicates superior puck possession throughout the season.
Boston’s Balanced Approach – The Bruins maintain a strong balance of offense and defense, making them a formidable opponent for any top‑tier team. Their 86.1% penalty‑kill rate gives them an edge in close games.
Vegas’ Offensive Firepower – The Golden Knights remain the league’s goal‑scoring machine, but their 2.55 GA/GP suggests that defensive adjustments are necessary to climb higher in the rankings.
Bottom‑Tier Challenges – Teams like Philadelphia and Carolina face dual challenges: a lackluster power play and high goals‑against numbers. Their ability to stay competitive hinges on tightening their defense and improving special‑teams performance.
The Importance of Pace – The rankings demonstrate that teams that perform well in the second half of the season, especially those that rally after early setbacks, can climb the ladder quickly. This dynamic approach keeps the standings fluid and reflective of current form.
5. Additional Context from Linked Articles
The ESPN page links to several supplementary resources that offer deeper insight into specific metrics:
NHL Standings – The official standings page shows the same win‑loss record and point totals, allowing fans to verify the ranking positions. It also includes a “Points %” column that corroborates the PPG figures used in the rankings.
NHL Stats – The advanced statistics section supplies raw numbers for Corsi, Fenwick, expected goals, and other advanced metrics. The Senators’ Corsi advantage of 54.3% and the Bruins’ 53.8% are highlighted, explaining their dominance.
Power‑Play and Penalty‑Kill Analysis – The special‑teams pages illustrate the Senators’ 22.7% PP efficiency and Boston’s 86.1% PK success, aligning with the ranking’s emphasis on these categories.
By integrating these data points, the ESPN power rankings provide a comprehensive, data‑driven narrative of the 2025‑26 NHL season, helping fans, analysts, and teams gauge where they stand and what it will take to climb or maintain their position in a highly competitive league.
Read the Full ESPN Article at:
https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/46871803/nhl-power-rankings-2025-26-best-teams-standings-best-stats-projections-pace
Like: 👍
on: Mon, Oct 06th 2025
by: Sports Illustrated
on: Mon, Aug 18th 2025
by: SB Nation
on: Fri, Oct 10th 2025
by: Sports Illustrated
Colin Cowherd Explains Mess Eagles Currently Have on Their Hands
on: Fri, Oct 10th 2025
by: Associated Press
Not currently playing and not a coach, Damian Lillard has a unique role with the Blazers
on: Wed, Sep 17th 2025
by: Sports Illustrated
on: Tue, Jul 22nd 2025
by: National Hockey League
on: Mon, Jul 21st 2025
by: AZ Central
Phoenix Suns Revamp Roster for 2025-26 Season, Aiming for Championship
on: Fri, Oct 31st 2025
by: Sports Illustrated
on: Thu, Oct 23rd 2025
by: HoopsHype
on: Sun, Oct 12th 2025
by: Associated Press
on: Wed, Oct 08th 2025
by: Sports Illustrated
on: Tue, Oct 07th 2025
by: BBC