Business and Finance Business and Finance
Sat, March 1, 2025
[ Last Saturday ] - MSN
How Much Is Apple Worth?
[ Last Saturday ] - MSN
Can your body survive CANCER?

Why Rigid RTO Mandates Cost More Than They Save


Published on 2025-03-01 17:21:02 - Forbes
  Print publication without navigation

  • As companies wrestle with return-to-office (RTO) mandates, many executives frame the debate as a binary choice: remote work versus in-office work.

The article by Solange Charas for Forbes, published on March 1, 2025, discusses the financial and cultural drawbacks of rigid Return-to-Office (RTO) mandates. It argues that such mandates often overlook the benefits of remote work, including increased productivity, employee satisfaction, and reduced overhead costs like office space. The piece highlights that enforcing strict RTO policies can lead to higher employee turnover, as workers value flexibility, potentially resulting in increased hiring and training costs. Additionally, it points out that companies might face a loss of talent to competitors offering more flexible work arrangements, and could suffer from decreased morale and innovation due to a lack of trust and autonomy. The article suggests that a hybrid model, tailored to the needs of both the business and its employees, would be more cost-effective and beneficial in the long run, fostering a culture of trust and adaptability.

Read the Full Forbes Article at:
[ https://www.forbes.com/sites/solangecharas/2025/03/01/why-rigid-rto-mandates-cost-more-than-they-save/ ]
Contributing Sources