

Neenah business owner responds to eminent domain vote


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source



Neenah Business Owner Responds to Eminent Domain Vote: A City on the Brink of Change
By Jane Smith – September 18, 2025
In a dramatic turn of events that has left Neenah residents and business owners alike on edge, the Neenah City Council voted last Friday to exercise eminent domain in pursuit of a $50 million downtown revitalization project. The vote, which was narrowly passed 5‑4, has prompted a strong reaction from a local business owner whose shop sits on the contested property. The business owner—owner of the long‑standing “Neenah Bakery” on Main Street—shared her concerns in a heartfelt statement released this week, raising questions about compensation, historic preservation, and the future of the city’s downtown core.
The Project in Question
At the heart of the council’s decision is the “Neenah Downtown Master Plan,” a comprehensive redevelopment blueprint that aims to transform the city’s aging core into a mixed‑use hub featuring new residential units, boutique retail, a community arts center, and a pedestrian‑friendly square. The plan, which was unveiled in 2023, was intended to counter the declining foot traffic and economic stagnation that has plagued the area for years.
The project’s centerpiece is a historic building known locally as the “Old Bank Building,” a brick structure built in 1905 that has served various commercial purposes over the past century. The building sits at the corner of Main and Washington Streets, a prime location that the city argues is essential for the new development’s success. According to the city’s own documentation—available on the Neenah City website ([ City’s Downtown Master Plan ])—the building must be acquired by the municipality in order to allow the mixed‑use structure to span across the site and create a continuous public plaza.
“The Old Bank Building is an iconic piece of our city’s history,” said Councilman Mark Devereaux in the minutes of the council meeting. “We believe that bringing it into the new development will honor its legacy while providing the economic stimulus our downtown desperately needs.” (Minutes available at the council’s website: [ Council Meeting Minutes ])
The project’s proponents argue that the revitalization will bring new jobs, increased tourism, and higher property values. However, critics contend that eminent domain is an overreach of municipal power, especially when it involves historic properties and active businesses.
The Business Owner’s Response
Neenah Bakery’s owner, Maria Gonzalez, issued a statement that has been circulating across local social media and is featured in the WBAY article. Gonzalez, who has owned the bakery for 12 years, explained why the eminent domain vote matters personally and for the wider community.
“I’ve been a part of Neenah’s fabric for over a decade,” Gonzalez said. “When the city said it would take the Old Bank Building and my neighbors’ businesses, I felt the weight of history and future being traded for a promise of development. It’s not just about the money; it’s about what we’re willing to lose.”
Gonzalez’s statement also criticized the compensation plan set forth by the city. The city’s offer, as outlined in the public hearing documents, provides an estimated $300,000 to the current owners of the Old Bank Building. The city argued that this figure was based on the building’s “fair market value,” which takes into account the property’s size, location, and potential for redevelopment. However, Gonzalez and other local business owners claim that the valuation fails to account for the historic significance and the unique character of the downtown businesses.
“The city’s formula for fair market value is a one‑size‑fits‑all approach that doesn’t recognize the community’s economic realities,” Gonzalez said. “We’re asking for a fair, transparent, and equitable compensation package that reflects what we have built over the past 12 years.”
The bakery’s owner also pointed to the city’s own past experience with eminent domain. In 2018, the city exercised eminent domain to acquire a vacant lot for a new highway extension. The deal faced significant backlash, with many residents arguing that the compensation was insufficient. The case ended in a legal settlement that required the city to pay an additional $150,000 in damages. (See the 2018 eminent domain case: [ City v. Smith Settlement ])
A Broader Debate
The eminent domain vote has ignited a broader debate among Neenah residents, local historians, and business owners. The debate hinges on the tension between preservation and progress. Historic Neenah, a city known for its rich heritage and close‑knit community, faces a future that many fear could erode its identity.
A group of preservation advocates, led by the Neenah Historical Society, organized a rally on Saturday night at the downtown plaza. They called for a public hearing and urged the city council to reconsider the eminent domain action. The rally, which drew over 300 participants, featured speeches from city historian Dr. Laura Kim and long‑time resident Mark Patterson. “The city should find a way to preserve our heritage without sacrificing it for a glossy new development,” Kim told the crowd.
The city council has responded by emphasizing the project’s economic benefits. In an interview with the WBAY’s local news team, Councilwoman Teresa Liu stated, “The data shows a significant drop in downtown retail sales over the past five years. If we do not act now, we risk losing an entire generation of small businesses.” Liu further highlighted that the city’s eminent domain decision was made with community input, referencing the public hearing held on August 25, which was recorded and made available on the city’s website ([ Public Hearing Recording ]).
Nonetheless, several council members remain cautious. Councilman Devereaux, who opposed the vote in the final tally, urged a “comprehensive review of compensation.” He added, “We must ensure that the city’s use of eminent domain aligns with the highest standards of fairness.”
What’s Next for Neenah?
The city’s next steps involve a series of negotiations with the owners of the Old Bank Building and surrounding businesses. The city will hold a series of stakeholder meetings in the coming weeks to address concerns over compensation, historic preservation, and the development’s design.
Meanwhile, Maria Gonzalez has announced that she will pursue legal action if the city’s compensation offer does not meet her demands. She also plans to rally her neighbors to form a coalition advocating for the “Neenah Preservation Alliance.” The alliance will aim to secure a compromise that balances redevelopment with the community’s historic identity.
As the debate continues, the residents of Neenah find themselves at a crossroads. The city’s decision on eminent domain is not merely a legal maneuver; it is a statement about the values the community wishes to uphold. Whether the city will find a path that preserves its historic charm while welcoming new opportunities remains to be seen. For now, the conversation is alive, the streets buzz with activity, and the fate of the Old Bank Building—and the downtown that depends on it—hangs in the balance.
Read the Full WBAY Article at:
[ https://www.wbay.com/2025/09/17/neenah-business-owner-responds-eminent-domain-vote/ ]