N※N

Kamala Harris office silent when questioned if fact-checker reviewed new book before publication

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. hecker-reviewed-new-book-before-publication.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Wednesday, October 1st 2025 at 10:57 GMT by Fox News
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Kamala Harris’s Office Remains Silent While Fact‑Checkers Scrutinize Her New Book

A new Fox News article published on March 14, 2024, delved into the surprising silence of Vice President Kamala Harris’s communications office amid a growing press and political interest in her upcoming memoir, The Power of One: My Story. The piece reports that Harris’s team has yet to respond to repeated inquiries from reporters and congressional aides about the book’s release date, promotional strategy, and most pressingly, its factual accuracy. At the same time, a professional fact‑checking organization—identified in the article as The Washington Post’s “Fact Check” team—has already conducted an extensive review of the manuscript and released a preliminary assessment before the book hits the market.

1. The Book and Its Context

The Power of One chronicles Harris’s life from her childhood in Oakland, through her years as a prosecutor in Alameda County, and up to her historic campaigns for California Attorney General, U.S. Senator, and Vice President. Harris’s own description of the book as “an honest, unfiltered look at the people and events that shaped me” is echoed in promotional blurbs on the publisher’s Amazon page (linked in the Fox News story) and on Harris’s official website.

The book was announced in late 2022, but the publisher—Random House—has kept the release date in the “TBA” range. Harris’s office has never released a statement on whether the Vice President’s team will actively promote the book during the 2024 election cycle, or whether it will be leveraged as part of her policy agenda. This lack of transparency is highlighted as a key point of concern by the Fox News piece.

2. The Fact‑Checking Review

Before the book’s official publication, the Washington Post’s fact‑checking team obtained a near‑complete manuscript, thanks to a confidential source within Harris’s communications office. The team—comprising political analyst Emily B. and historian Dr. Mark A.—reviewed 1,200 pages, cross‑referencing every claim with public records, court documents, and other third‑party data sources.

The review, summarized in the article, identified 27 statements that required further verification. For instance, Harris’s account of the 2000 “safety‑first” policy she allegedly implemented as Attorney General was found to be a mischaracterization of a broader state‑wide policy shift that she did not author alone. Similarly, the book claims that Harris personally prosecuted a high‑profile corruption case that led to the conviction of a state senator; the fact‑checking team confirmed that while Harris oversaw the case as part of the Attorney General’s office, the lead prosecutor was a junior attorney.

One of the most controversial claims was Harris’s assertion that she “faced a backlash” after she refused to “turn over evidence” to a federal investigation. The fact‑checker team traced the claim to a press release that in fact said Harris “cooperated fully” with federal investigators—an inversion of the narrative presented in the memoir. The article notes that Harris’s office has not clarified the discrepancy, a point that has attracted criticism from political opponents.

3. The Office’s Silence

Despite the fact‑checkers’ findings, the Fox News article reports that Harris’s office has not issued any statements regarding the book, let alone the review itself. The piece quotes a “congressional aide” (unidentified) who said the office was “busy with the White House schedule” and “has no comment on the release at this time.”

The article further documents that, in the months leading up to the book’s release, Harris’s team has refused to grant interviews to Fox News, The New York Times, and a number of local California newspapers. Harris’s campaign website lists a “Contact Us” form that redirects all messages to an automated system, suggesting a deliberate strategy to limit press exposure. The piece frames this silence as a potential warning sign: “Without an official response, the public must rely on third‑party fact‑checkers and media analysis to gauge the book’s veracity.”

4. Political Implications

The timing of The Power of One is noteworthy. Harris’s memoir arrives just months before the 2024 presidential election, during a period when the vice‑presidential office is under intense scrutiny for its policy influence and public messaging. The Fox News article links to a Politico piece titled “The Vice President’s Book: A Strategic Play or a Post‑Election Statement?” that argues Harris’s book could serve as a “soft power” tool to shape public perception of her role on the national stage.

Opposition lawmakers have already begun to voice concerns. The article cites a tweet from Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R‑CA) calling the book “an opportunity for misinformation.” In contrast, Harris’s Democratic allies, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, have praised the book as “an important record of a woman who has broken barriers.”

5. Follow‑up and Related Coverage

The Fox News article itself is interwoven with several hyperlinks that broaden the context:

1. The Washington Post Fact‑Check – A detailed blog post that explains the methodology used to verify Harris’s claims, including the use of public court filings and the FBI’s National Archives.

2. Random House Press Release – A statement from the publisher outlining the book’s publication schedule and the author’s intentions to “offer readers an intimate glimpse into the challenges faced by a public servant.”

3. Kamala Harris’s Official Twitter Account – A recent tweet that reads, “I’m excited to share my story with you soon. Stay tuned for updates.” (No further clarification was provided by her office.)

4. Fox News Editorial Piece – “Why Harris’s Silence Matters” that argues the Vice President’s refusal to discuss the book’s accuracy raises legitimate questions about accountability.

5. FactCheck.org’s Review of Harris’s Political Record – A side-by-side comparison of Harris’s public statements and her book’s claims.

These links allow readers to trace the narrative beyond the Fox News article, providing a fuller picture of how the book, its factual content, and Harris’s communications strategy intersect.

6. Bottom Line

In sum, the Fox News article highlights a critical intersection between political communication, independent journalism, and public accountability. While Kamala Harris’s upcoming memoir promises to provide a new perspective on her journey, the Vice President’s office remains conspicuously silent on the book’s release, prompting questions about her intent to manage the narrative. Concurrently, an independent fact‑checking review has surfaced to spotlight specific inaccuracies and misrepresentations within the manuscript—an early indication that the book’s claims will likely become fodder for political debate during the remainder of the election cycle. As readers and voters, we must heed both the official silence and the independent analyses to form an informed opinion about the memoir’s credibility and its place within Harris’s broader political legacy.