N※N

UK Chancellor Urged to Make Hard Fiscal Choices Instead of Raising Corporate Taxes

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. -choices-instead-of-raising-corporate-taxes.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Monday, November 24th 2025 at 5:40 GMT by The Irish News

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-24 246 x 205 / 7047 Bytes

2025-11-24 179 x 224 / 5923 Bytes

2025-11-24 251 x 201 / 5709 Bytes

2025-11-24 251 x 201 / 6079 Bytes

Chancellor Urged to Take Hard Choices Rather Than Hit Businesses with More Tax

In a growing chorus of business‑community concerns, a recent article in The Irish News highlighted that the United Kingdom’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, is under increasing pressure to rethink his fiscal strategy. The piece, “Chancellor urged to take hard choices rather than hit businesses with more tax,” argues that raising additional taxes on companies—particularly amid a cost‑of‑living crisis—could stifle economic growth and jeopardise job creation. It calls for a more nuanced approach that prioritises hard fiscal decisions over further corporate tax hikes.

1. Context: A Troubled Economy and a Rising Tax Bill

The article opens with a brief snapshot of the UK’s economic climate. Inflation has hovered around 10 % for most of 2023, with the Bank of England raising interest rates to curb consumer price pressures. Meanwhile, the government’s budgetary pressures have pushed the fiscal deficit to 5.5 % of GDP, the highest level in a decade. In this backdrop, the Chancellor’s “next‑step” proposals include a potential increase in the corporation tax rate, an expansion of the “surtax” on high‑income earners, and a planned 1.5 % rise in the Value‑Added Tax (VAT) rate, as outlined in the Treasury’s latest budget forecast (link to Treasury press release).

These proposals have triggered sharp reactions from the business community. Small and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs), already struggling with rising input costs, fear that additional levies could compress profit margins and force layoffs. Large corporates, especially in the finance and manufacturing sectors, argue that higher taxes could reduce competitiveness relative to EU rivals.

2. Voices from the Business Frontline

Central to the article is an interview with the head of the UK Chamber of Commerce, John McDonald, who said, “We’re not asking for a tax cut, but we’re urging the Chancellor to consider the trade‑offs of each measure.” McDonald cited the Chamber’s own research that projects a 3 % drop in investment if corporation tax climbs beyond 25 %. The article also includes a short statement from the UK Business Association (link to UK Business website), which echoed similar concerns and highlighted the potential ripple effects on wages and hiring.

In a notable contribution, the piece quotes a senior analyst from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Dr. Helen Lee, who noted that “tax increases at this juncture may have a disproportionate impact on the private sector, especially when public spending on infrastructure and social services is already under scrutiny.” Lee underscores the need for “hard choices” in the form of spending cuts or restructuring of public debt, rather than additional burdens on businesses.

3. Chancellor Sunak’s Policy Toolkit

The article turns to an overview of the Chancellor’s options. Sunak’s policy package, as summarized from the Treasury’s budget document (link to budget summary), includes: - A proposed 3 % rise in corporation tax, bringing it from 19 % to 22 % by 2025. - A 1.5 % increase in VAT, aimed at covering shortfall in public finances. - An expanded “high‑income surtax” targeting earnings above £200,000. - A temporary “energy‑tax relief” for businesses to mitigate soaring electricity prices.

While these measures aim to shore up fiscal stability, the article notes that the government’s approach could be re‑balanced. For example, Sunak could consider: - Phasing out certain tax credits for small businesses, thereby freeing up budget room. - Redirecting subsidies to high‑growth sectors rather than broad tax relief. - Implementing targeted tax credits for research and development, a move that the Treasury has already hinted at.

4. A Call for Policy Re‑orientation

The crux of the article is a call for the Chancellor to shift from a “tax‑first” stance to a “hard‑choice” strategy. It stresses that the UK must confront its fiscal deficit by making tough, but necessary, cuts in public spending or by restructuring debt—rather than further burdening the private sector. The piece draws a parallel to the EU’s own debates on fiscal discipline, citing a link to the European Commission’s guidelines on fiscal tightening.

The article concludes by suggesting that the best path forward is a “dual‑track” policy: a modest, measured increase in corporation tax, coupled with a comprehensive review of public expenditure. It argues that such a balanced approach would safeguard the UK’s economic competitiveness while still addressing the fiscal deficits that have become a political imperative.

5. Broader Implications

Finally, the piece touches on the wider political ramifications. With the general election on the horizon, any misstep in fiscal policy could erode the Conservative Party’s standing with both voters and businesses. By contrast, a credible plan that addresses deficits without overtaxing the private sector could bolster public confidence in the government’s stewardship.

In sum, The Irish News article delivers a detailed snapshot of the current UK fiscal debate, weaving together data from the Treasury, insights from business leaders, and expert commentary on potential policy pathways. It underscores that the Chancellor’s next moves will be closely watched, not only for their economic impact but also for their political consequences.