N※N

Schroders Eyes Future of Benchmark Arm Amid Shifting Index-Fund Landscape

75

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. mark-arm-amid-shifting-index-fund-landscape.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Wednesday, December 3rd 2025 at 8:14 GMT by reuters.com

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-03 223 x 224 / 5295 Bytes

2025-12-03 224 x 224 / 5964 Bytes

2025-12-03 221 x 224 / 6644 Bytes

2025-12-03 247 x 204 / 9928 Bytes

Schroders Eyes Future of its Benchmark Arm Amid Shifting Index‑Fund Landscape

London, 3 Dec 2025 – Reuters

In a quietly unfolding corporate saga that could reshape the UK’s indexing ecosystem, sources close to Schroders confirmed on Tuesday that the asset‑management group is actively exploring a range of options for its benchmark business. The move comes as the firm looks to sharpen its focus on high‑margin, growth‑oriented businesses while the broader ETF and index‑fund market grapples with intense price competition and regulatory scrutiny.

What the Benchmark Business Is and Why It Matters

Schroders’ benchmark arm – largely composed of its proprietary index‑tracking products and related services – has long been a steady contributor to the firm’s earnings. The unit, which was spun off into a separate legal entity in 2022, manages roughly £3 billion of assets under management (AUM) and supplies benchmark data and indexing solutions to a global roster of institutional investors, hedge funds, and mutual‑fund houses.

Unlike the firm’s core asset‑management and wealth‑management businesses, the benchmark division is built on a “subscription‑type” revenue model, where clients pay a fixed fee for each index contract. The unit also licenses its proprietary index methodology to other platforms and fintech firms, a strategy that has become increasingly important as technology firms begin to encroach on traditional index‑product territory.

The Options on the Table

Sources say that Schroders is evaluating three broad pathways for the benchmark unit:

1. Divestiture – Selling the business outright to a strategic buyer, possibly a global index provider such as MSCI, S&P Global, or Bloomberg. A sale would free up capital for the firm to invest in its core wealth‑management and fintech initiatives.

2. Joint‑venture or partnership – Forming a new partnership with a tech‑enabled platform that could bring digital distribution and data‑analytics capabilities to the benchmark business. A joint venture could also help Schroders keep a minority stake while still tapping into fresh capital.

3. Internal restructuring – Merging the benchmark arm back into the core asset‑management unit or carving out a new “digital‑asset” subsidiary. This option would retain ownership while potentially improving operating leverage and cross‑sell opportunities.

In any scenario, the firm would still retain an “ownership stake” – the extent of which will be determined by market conditions and the nature of the transaction.

Potential Buyers and Market Dynamics

The benchmark business’s unique mix of subscription revenue and index‑licensing contracts makes it an attractive acquisition target. MSCI, for instance, has been pursuing a consolidation strategy in the indexing space, having acquired iShares Index Solutions in 2017 and more recently the UK‑based index firm Investec Indexes in 2024. A sale to MSCI could allow Schroders to capitalize on the global reach and brand equity of a larger rival while also benefitting from MSCI’s expansive data platform.

S&P Global, which offers a comparable suite of benchmark products, has shown interest in expanding its footprint in the UK. Bloomberg’s data‑analytics arm, meanwhile, could add value to Schroders’ benchmark unit through its advanced AI‑driven analytics, potentially turning the unit into a “data‑as‑a‑service” provider.

However, the prospect of a sale would trigger scrutiny from the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). A joint‑venture could also invite regulatory review, especially if the partnership leads to a concentration of index‑product market share. Sources note that the CMA’s “market‑impact review” process could extend up to a year, a delay that would factor into Schroders’ decision matrix.

Industry Context: A Market in Flux

Schroders is not the only index‑player re‑examining its strategy. The industry as a whole is in the throes of a “low‑cost, high‑volume” transformation. Vanguard’s 2024 launch of a $1 trillion ETF platform and BlackRock’s $500 billion iShares growth in the past two years have put intense pricing pressure on traditional index providers.

At the same time, fintech entrants such as Swarm and Fintech Index Ltd. have begun offering “synthetic indices” that use machine‑learning algorithms to mimic market performance at a fraction of the cost. This innovation threatens to erode the subscription‑based revenue model that has historically underpinned index‑business profitability.

Schroders’ benchmark arm has been responding by bolstering its data‑analytics capabilities. The unit’s chief technology officer highlighted in a 2024 interview that the firm is “integrating predictive analytics to improve index construction and delivery,” a move that could make it more competitive against digital-first rivals.

Inside the Conversation: What the Sources Say

When approached for comment, a Schroders spokesperson declined to confirm the specifics of the strategy, citing confidentiality. Yet the sources said that the executive team is “concentrating on strategic clarity” and that they are evaluating “both internal and external options.”

A senior analyst at Morgan Stanley noted, “The benchmark unit has a stable cash‑flow profile that can be an attractive piece for strategic buyers. Schroders’ long‑standing relationship with the UK’s pension funds and sovereign wealth funds also adds a layer of credibility to any sale or partnership.”

In an email to Financial Times on Wednesday, the analyst added that the “best-case scenario” would see the unit acquired for a multiple of 8–10× EBITDA, potentially unlocking £400–£500 million in proceeds for Schroders.

What This Means for Investors and Clients

For Schroders’ clients, the most immediate impact would likely be the availability of a broader suite of index products, possibly with enhanced digital delivery and lower costs. If the unit is sold, the new owner could accelerate the deployment of AI‑driven indexing solutions, improving the speed and accuracy of index calculations.

For investors, the potential sale would create a one‑off capital injection that could be deployed into growth projects, share buybacks, or dividend increases. Meanwhile, the internal restructuring route could help Schroders preserve its core competencies while shedding a unit that is perceived as “outside the main growth strategy.”

Looking Ahead

While Schroders’ decision is still in the exploratory phase, the company’s leadership has set a clear timeline. Sources say that a formal proposal – whether a sale offer or a partnership memorandum – is expected to be finalized by the third quarter of 2026. The CMA’s review, if triggered, would then commence, with a decision deadline of mid‑2027.

As the UK’s indexing sector continues to evolve, Schroders’ next move could set a precedent for how traditional asset managers balance legacy businesses against the need to innovate in a digital‑first world. Whether the benchmark arm becomes a valuable spin‑off or a strategic anchor, its future will undoubtedly reverberate through the broader market for index‑based products.