N※N

We Have No One to Blame for Public Health Disasters but Ourselves

  //business-finance.news-articles.net/content/202 .. e-for-public-health-disasters-but-ourselves.html
  Published in Business and Finance on Thursday, October 23rd 2025 at 13:48 GMT by The Nation
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-23 283 x 178 / 12097 Bytes

2025-10-23 179 x 224 / 7087 Bytes

2025-10-23 147 x 224 / 10992 Bytes

2025-10-23 225 x 224 / 15746 Bytes

2025-10-23 310 x 162 / 9744 Bytes

Rolling Back Regulation

At the heart of the article is the claim that Trump’s environmental policy was driven by a desire to reduce regulation and lower costs for industry, often at the expense of public health. Early in his term, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a “clean‑air rule” that reversed the Clean Power Plan of the Obama era. The Clean Power Plan had set state‑specific limits on carbon emissions from power plants, a key source of air pollution linked to asthma, lung cancer, and premature death. Trump’s rule instead allowed states to set their own standards, effectively removing a federal cap and creating a patchwork of weaker limits that critics argue will keep America’s air quality below the standards that protect the most vulnerable populations.

The article also highlights the agency’s decision to roll back the “Mercury and Air Toxics Standards,” which had tightened the permissible levels of mercury emissions from coal‑fired power plants. The standards were lifted in 2019 after the EPA claimed that the regulation was too costly, but the scientific literature consistently shows that mercury pollution disproportionately harms children and the elderly, impairing cognitive development and cardiovascular health.

Funding Cuts and Agency Weakening

In addition to policy rollbacks, the piece points to a systematic reduction in federal funding for the public‑health apparatus. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) saw a 13% cut in its budget between 2017 and 2020, shrinking the agency’s capacity to conduct surveillance, run vaccine campaigns, and respond to outbreaks. The article argues that this underfunding contributed to a lack of preparedness for the COVID‑19 pandemic, as the CDC’s ability to test, trace, and monitor the virus was severely constrained.

Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020 further isolated the U.S. from global public‑health coordination. The Nation’s writers note that this move deprived American scientists of critical data sharing and international research collaboration, a loss that the pandemic would only magnify.

Ignoring Scientific Consensus

Perhaps most damning is the administration’s repeated dismissal of scientific consensus. The article cites several instances where Trump’s officials directly contradicted climate scientists and public‑health experts. In a 2017 speech, the president labeled climate change as a “hoax” promoted by China. Later that year, the EPA announced it would not pursue new regulations on the health impacts of particulate matter, arguing that the science was “inconclusive.” This stance directly conflicts with a vast body of research linking fine‑particle pollution to heart disease, stroke, and respiratory ailments.

The Nation piece also points to Trump’s “unfiltered” statements about the origins of COVID‑19, suggesting that the virus could have been engineered in a laboratory. While such claims have no basis in evidence, the article argues that they created public confusion and eroded trust in science—an effect that, the authors say, has long‑term consequences for public‑health policy.

The Health Consequences of Environmental Neglect

Central to the article is the argument that environmental policy is inseparable from public‑health outcomes. The writers describe how urban areas with higher exposure to vehicular emissions experience greater rates of asthma and hypertension. They also bring in data from the CDC’s National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, which shows that communities near industrial sites face higher rates of childhood cancers and developmental disorders. By stripping away federal protections, the Trump administration effectively increased the risk of these health outcomes.

Calls for Action

The Nation concludes with a call to rebuild the public‑health infrastructure that the Trump era eroded. This includes restoring funding to the CDC, re‑establishing the WHO as a partner in global health, and reversing the rollbacks on air and water quality standards. The article stresses that this is not merely an environmental issue but a human‑rights issue, because the right to clean air, water, and a safe environment is integral to the health and dignity of all Americans.

In sum, the article provides a comprehensive critique of the Trump administration’s approach to public health and the environment, illustrating how a short‑sighted policy agenda can have lasting and far‑reaching implications for the nation’s health.