N※N

Israel and Iran Usher In New Era of Psychological Warfare

In the evolving landscape of modern warfare, the conflict between Israel and Iran has taken on a new dimension, extending beyond traditional military engagements into the realm of psychological operations. This intricate and shadowy form of warfare, often conducted through digital platforms and covert campaigns, seeks to influence public perception, sow discord, and undermine morale without firing a single shot. Both nations, locked in a decades-long rivalry rooted in ideological and geopolitical tensions, have increasingly turned to psychological warfare as a critical tool in their arsenals, leveraging technology and information to gain strategic advantages.

At the heart of this psychological battle is the use of disinformation and propaganda, disseminated through social media, fake news outlets, and hacked communication channels. Israel, with its advanced technological capabilities and sophisticated intelligence apparatus, has been accused of orchestrating campaigns to destabilize Iranian public opinion. These efforts often involve spreading false narratives about the Iranian government’s stability, economic conditions, or military prowess. For instance, anonymous social media accounts and bots, believed to be linked to Israeli operatives, have been used to amplify stories of internal dissent within Iran, portraying the regime as weak and on the brink of collapse. Such narratives aim to erode trust between the Iranian populace and their leaders, fostering a sense of disillusionment and unrest.

Iran, on the other hand, has not remained a passive target in this psychological war. The Islamic Republic has developed its own robust mechanisms for countering Israeli influence and projecting its power through information warfare. Iranian state-sponsored hackers and propagandists have targeted Israeli citizens with messages designed to incite fear and division. These campaigns often focus on highlighting Israel’s vulnerabilities, such as the threat of rocket attacks from Iranian proxies like Hezbollah, or by exaggerating the impact of domestic issues within Israel, including political polarization and social inequality. By flooding Israeli social media with doctored images, fabricated news stories, and threatening rhetoric, Iran seeks to create a pervasive sense of insecurity among the Israeli public, undermining confidence in their government’s ability to protect them.

One of the most striking aspects of this psychological conflict is the use of cyberattacks as a means of delivering propaganda. Both Israel and Iran have demonstrated remarkable prowess in penetrating each other’s digital infrastructure. Iranian hackers, for example, have been linked to breaches of Israeli municipal systems, where they have defaced websites with anti-Israel slogans or broadcasted ominous warnings to citizens. Similarly, Israel has been implicated in sophisticated cyber operations targeting Iranian institutions, including the manipulation of state media to broadcast messages that contradict official narratives. These digital incursions serve a dual purpose: they not only disrupt normal operations but also act as a psychological weapon, signaling to the adversary that their defenses are penetrable and their society is vulnerable.

The psychological warfare between Israel and Iran also extends to the manipulation of international perceptions. Both nations are acutely aware of the importance of global opinion in shaping the legitimacy of their actions. Israel often portrays Iran as an existential threat, emphasizing its nuclear ambitions and support for militant groups across the Middle East. Through carefully crafted media campaigns, Israeli officials and their allies work to maintain a narrative of Iran as a rogue state, thereby justifying preemptive or defensive measures. Iran, conversely, seeks to depict Israel as an aggressor and oppressor, particularly by focusing on the Palestinian issue. Iranian media outlets and social media campaigns frequently highlight alleged Israeli human rights abuses, aiming to garner sympathy from global audiences and isolate Israel diplomatically.

This battle for hearts and minds is not limited to state actors. Non-state entities, including hacktivist groups and proxy organizations, play a significant role in amplifying the psychological operations of both sides. For Israel, private tech firms and cybersecurity experts often collaborate with government agencies to develop tools for monitoring and countering Iranian disinformation. In Iran, groups affiliated with the Revolutionary Guard Corps are believed to operate networks of trolls and bots that push anti-Israel content across multiple platforms. These decentralized efforts make it difficult to attribute specific campaigns to either government directly, adding a layer of deniability that further complicates the conflict.

The impact of psychological warfare on the civilian populations of both countries cannot be overstated. In Israel, constant exposure to threatening messages and cyber intrusions fosters a climate of anxiety, with many citizens feeling as though they are under perpetual siege. Parents worry about the safety of their children, while businesses grapple with the economic fallout of perceived instability. In Iran, the barrage of negative propaganda about the government contributes to a sense of hopelessness among the youth, many of whom already face economic hardship and political repression. The psychological toll of this invisible war is profound, as it erodes trust in institutions and exacerbates existing social tensions.

Moreover, the use of psychological warfare raises complex ethical questions. Unlike conventional warfare, where the rules of engagement are often codified under international law, the realm of information and psychological operations remains largely unregulated. The deliberate spread of falsehoods and the manipulation of public sentiment blur the lines between legitimate defense and unethical interference. Both Israel and Iran have faced criticism for their tactics, with human rights organizations warning that such campaigns can incite violence and deepen societal divisions. Yet, in the absence of clear norms or accountability mechanisms, both nations continue to push the boundaries of what is permissible in this shadowy domain.

The technological arms race between Israel and Iran further intensifies their psychological conflict. Advances in artificial intelligence and deepfake technology have made it easier to create convincing forgeries, whether in the form of fabricated videos of leaders making inflammatory statements or doctored evidence of military actions. These tools allow for the rapid dissemination of disinformation on an unprecedented scale, making it increasingly difficult for the public to discern fact from fiction. As both countries invest heavily in these technologies, the potential for escalation grows, with each side seeking to outmaneuver the other in the digital battlefield.

Beyond the immediate effects on their respective populations, the psychological warfare between Israel and Iran has broader implications for regional stability. The Middle East, already a tinderbox of sectarian and political conflicts, is further destabilized by the constant undercurrent of disinformation and propaganda. Neighboring countries, caught in the crossfire of this rivalry, often become unwitting targets of psychological operations as well. For instance, Iranian campaigns may seek to influence public opinion in Gulf states allied with Israel, while Israeli efforts might aim to undermine Iran’s relationships with its proxies in Iraq or Syria. The ripple effects of these operations contribute to a climate of mistrust and hostility that hinders diplomatic efforts to resolve longstanding disputes.

In conclusion, the psychological warfare between Israel and Iran represents a new frontier in their enduring conflict, one that is fought not with bullets or bombs but with bytes and narratives. This invisible battle, waged through cyberattacks, disinformation, and propaganda, seeks to weaken the enemy from within by targeting the minds of its citizens. While both nations have achieved tactical successes in this arena, the long-term consequences of such warfare remain uncertain. The erosion of trust, the exacerbation of social divisions, and the potential for miscalculation all pose significant risks, not only to Israel and Iran but to the broader region as well. As technology continues to evolve, so too will the methods of psychological warfare, ensuring that this shadowy conflict remains a defining feature of their rivalry for years to come. The challenge lies in finding ways to mitigate the harm caused by these operations, whether through international agreements, public education on media literacy, or other means of fostering resilience against manipulation. Until then, the war of words and perceptions will continue to shape the battlefield as much as any physical confrontation.

Read the Full The New York Times Article at:
[ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/15/technology/israel-iran-psychological-warfare.html ]