Business and Finance
Source : (remove) : The Hockey News - Ottawa Senators
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Business and Finance
Source : (remove) : The Hockey News - Ottawa Senators
RSSJSONXMLCSV

Ford Threatens Investors With Another Family Member

  Copy link into your clipboard //stocks-investing.news-articles.net/content/202 .. eatens-investors-with-another-family-member.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Stocks and Investing on by 24/7 Wall St
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  Another member of the Ford family is reportedly poised to take up the reins of Ford. Is that what investors want as the stock struggles?


Ford's Latest Move: Another Family Member Sparks Investor Concerns


In the ever-evolving landscape of automotive giants, Ford Motor Company has once again stirred the pot with what some investors are calling a potential threat to shareholder value. A recent article from 24/7 Wall St. delves into this issue, highlighting how the company's deep-rooted family ties could be positioning yet another Ford family member for a prominent role, potentially at the expense of broader investor interests. This development comes at a time when Ford is navigating turbulent waters in the electric vehicle (EV) market, supply chain disruptions, and shifting consumer demands. The piece argues that while family involvement has been a hallmark of Ford's identity since its founding, it may now be veering into territory that undermines professional management and long-term growth strategies.

To understand the gravity of this situation, it's essential to revisit Ford's storied history. Founded by Henry Ford in 1903, the company has remained under the influence of the Ford family for over a century. This is largely due to a unique dual-class stock structure that grants the family supervoting shares, giving them disproportionate control despite holding only a minority of the economic interest. Currently, the family controls about 40% of the voting power through these Class B shares, even though they own just 2% of the company's equity. This setup has allowed figures like William Clay Ford Jr., the great-grandson of Henry Ford and current executive chairman, to steer the company through various eras, from the post-World War II boom to the modern push toward sustainability.

The article points to recent signals that another family member might be groomed for a high-level position, which it frames as a "threat" to investors. Speculation centers around Alexandra Ford English, daughter of Bill Ford, who has already made inroads into the company. She joined Ford's board of directors in 2021, becoming the first woman from the Ford family to do so. At just 35 years old at the time, her appointment raised eyebrows among analysts who questioned whether it was merit-based or a nod to legacy. The piece suggests that Ford could be eyeing her for an even more influential role, perhaps in operations or strategy, amid CEO Jim Farley's tenure. This isn't without precedent; the family has a history of inserting relatives into key spots. For instance, Edsel Ford II, Bill Ford's cousin, served on the board for decades, and Henry Ford II, known as "Hank the Deuce," led the company through the 1960s and 1970s with a mix of innovation and controversy.

What makes this a "threat" in the eyes of the article? Primarily, it's the concern over nepotism potentially overriding sound business decisions. Ford has faced criticism for lagging behind competitors like Tesla and General Motors in the EV race. The company's ambitious plans, such as the $11.4 billion investment in EV and battery plants announced in 2021, have been hampered by production delays and cost overruns. Investors worry that family involvement could prioritize preserving the Ford legacy over aggressive, shareholder-focused strategies. For example, during the 2008 financial crisis, Bill Ford's decision to mortgage company assets—including the iconic Blue Oval logo—to secure loans was bold, but it also underscored the family's willingness to bet big on their vision, sometimes at high risk.

The article draws parallels to other family-controlled enterprises, both successful and cautionary. On one hand, there's Walmart, where the Walton family's influence has driven consistent growth through a clear retail strategy. On the other, there's the Murdoch family's media empire, where internal family dynamics have led to public scandals and stock volatility at companies like News Corp. Ford falls somewhere in between; its family control has fostered stability during downturns but has also been blamed for slow adaptation. In 2017, when Ford ousted CEO Mark Fields amid slumping sales, Bill Ford played a pivotal role in selecting Jim Hackett as successor, a move that some saw as too insular. Hackett's tenure was marked by a focus on "fitness" initiatives but ultimately failed to ignite share price growth, leading to Farley's appointment in 2020.

Financially, the implications are stark. Ford's stock (NYSE: F) has been a rollercoaster, trading around $10-$14 per share in recent years, far below its peaks in the late 1990s when it hovered near $30. The article notes that while the company reported $158 billion in revenue in 2022 and aims for 8% EBIT margins by 2026, investor confidence is waning. Dividend yields, historically a draw for long-term holders at about 5-6%, could be jeopardized if family-driven decisions lead to misallocation of capital. For instance, Ford's push into autonomous vehicles through Argo AI ended in a $2.7 billion writedown in 2022, a venture that some attribute to overly optimistic family-backed bets rather than data-driven caution.

Critics in the piece argue that another family member's rise could exacerbate governance issues. Proxy advisory firms like ISS and Glass Lewis have occasionally flagged Ford's board for lacking independence due to family dominance. In 2023, shareholders pushed back against executive compensation packages, with say-on-pay votes dipping below 80% approval—a subtle rebellion against perceived cronyism. The article quotes unnamed investors expressing frustration: "We're not investing in a family dynasty; we're investing in a global automaker that needs to compete with the likes of BYD and Volkswagen." This sentiment echoes broader debates in corporate America about the merits of founder-led versus professionally managed firms. Companies like Amazon under Jeff Bezos thrived with founder control, but transitions can be rocky, as seen with Boeing's recent leadership woes.

Looking ahead, the article speculates on potential outcomes. If Alexandra Ford English or another relative ascends, it could signal a doubling down on Ford's heritage brands like Mustang and F-150, potentially at the expense of bolder EV innovations. Ford's Model e division, aimed at electric mobility, has ambitious goals like producing 2 million EVs annually by 2026, but execution has been spotty. Delays in the F-150 Lightning production and competition from cheaper Chinese imports add pressure. A family member in a decision-making role might emphasize American manufacturing roots, appealing to patriotic consumers but risking alienation in global markets.

On the flip side, proponents of family involvement highlight intangible benefits. Bill Ford has been a vocal advocate for sustainability, pushing Ford toward carbon neutrality by 2050. His personal stake ensures long-term thinking, unlike short-termist hedge funds. The article acknowledges this, noting that family control has prevented hostile takeovers, allowing Ford to weather storms that sank peers like Chrysler (pre-Stellantis merger).

Ultimately, the piece warns that this "threat" could manifest in diluted earnings, strategic missteps, or even a shareholder revolt. With activist investors like Carl Icahn having eyed Ford in the past, any perceived favoritism might invite proxy battles. For retail investors, the advice is clear: monitor board announcements closely and diversify holdings. Institutional players, meanwhile, may push for reforms to the dual-class structure, a hot topic in ESG circles.

In conclusion, Ford's flirtation with another family member underscores a timeless tension between legacy and progress. While the Ford name built an empire, it must evolve to thrive in a tech-driven auto industry. Investors are left pondering: Is this a strengthening of roots or a branch too far? As Ford accelerates toward an electric future, the family's grip on the wheel will determine whether it leads to victory lane or a costly detour. This narrative isn't just about one company; it's a microcosm of how family legacies intersect with modern capitalism, where transparency and meritocracy increasingly demand the spotlight. (Word count: 1,128)

Read the Full 24/7 Wall St Article at:
[ https://247wallst.com/investing/2025/07/30/ford-threatens-investors-with-another-family-member/ ]


Similar Business and Finance Publications